[Bldg-sim] Optimizing Thermal Mass in Design Builder

Hayes Zirnhelt hzirnhelt at hotmail.com
Tue Mar 15 09:04:42 PDT 2011


Hi David,

Thanks for your help. I've attached the sensitivity results for the six simulations in the excel file, which shows the trend, and the input files. Do you know of any good references for thermal mass behavior?

Thanks,
Hayes

Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Optimizing Thermal Mass in Design Builder
From: david at d-n-a-design.com
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 07:01:56 -0700
To: hzirnhelt at hotmail.com

Depends on you model, climate, many many things. Can you post your model?  I've found energyplus to be very good at mass modeling with appropriate results.  A highy insulated south facing zone in a heating climate will like a lot more mass than other models. Mass with direct solar acts very differently than other conditions.     To check designbuilder, export your model and review in detail using openstudio and text editor. 
David

On Mar 14, 2011, at 19:25, Hayes Zirnhelt <hzirnhelt at hotmail.com> wrote:


Hi,I am looking for some feedback on thermal mass optimization for passive solar in DesignBuilder/ EnergyPlus.
I attempted a basic sensitivity analysis for thermal mass optimization for a very basic passive solar design (one south facing window, lots of insulation, all assemblies with interior concrete thermal mass). I modelled this concept using DesignBuilder with various concrete thicknesses (5cm to 50cm) but keeping the envelope U value, and all other parameters constant. I used the CTF algorithm. The annual simulation results indicate that increasing thermal mass past 20cm continues to decrease heating energy consumption, in a somewhat linear fashion. Even more unusual, was that the savings from going with 30cm compared to 20, was much greater than that achieved by the change from 10cm to 20cm. 
This does not match with the literature I have read, which suggest that this relationship should be a negative exponential decay (continuous diminishing energy savings with each added thickness). Many guidelines suggest that savings plateau at 20cm of thermal mass (as concrete).

Is this a problem with EnergyPlus? Or DesignBuilder? Any suggestions?

Thanks for your time,

Hayes Zirnhelt
M.A.Sc Candidate, RU Building Science
B.A.Sc Integrated Engineering

 		 	   		  
_______________________________________________
Bldg-sim mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110315/1a11e875/attachment-0002.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: 0.5m thermal mass PS house.idf
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 155842 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110315/1a11e875/attachment-0004.obj>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: Thermal Mass DB sensitivity.xls
Type: application/vnd.ms-excel
Size: 15360 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110315/1a11e875/attachment-0002.xls>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: house conceptual w  heater, 0.5m mass.dsb
Type: application/octet-stream
Size: 1322825 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110315/1a11e875/attachment-0005.obj>


More information about the Bldg-sim mailing list