[Bldg-sim] Domestic Hot Water Profile for Indoor Soccer Facility

Dónal O'Connor oconnor_dj at hotmail.com
Mon Feb 10 18:22:43 PST 2014


Hi all,

Thank you all for your input.

I will ensure my annual DHW usage is consistent with what is specified for the WE credit (showers and faucets), and develop the DHW schedule from there.

Kind Regards,

Dónal

Date: Mon, 10 Feb 2014 09:52:19 +0900
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] Domestic Hot Water Profile for Indoor Soccer Facility
From: dionisiofranca at gmail.com
To: jcrossett at phasechange.com
CC: oconnor_dj at hotmail.com; bldg-sim at lists.onebuilding.org

Hi Donal,
Usual LEED 2009 projects base the shower uses on FTE/ visitor/ resident numbers. If you are dealing with a facility that works differently, you'll probably prefer to base your FTE/ visitor numbers on design assumptions or information from the facility owner. It is a good idea to check out with USGBC their opinion on your assumptions before submitting your project. You can to that bty clicking on USGBC's page contact us link.

Good luck,Dionisio FRANCAM Arch, LEED AP+OM, ND

On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 7:09 AM, Jeremiah Crossett <jcrossett at phasechange.com> wrote:

My experience is to develop a diversity schedule that seems reasonable, then so long as you keep it the same for the proposed and the baseline it would be fine. If there is a MEP on the project you should have a peak flow rate, the peak should be dictated by MEP assumptions, while your schedule should coincide with MEP WeP1 calculations, that are based on the building basis of design from the architect and owner assumptions.   The section 1.4 tables provided by USGBC have a section that I found useful in making assumptions, and also for documentation, see attached example.. For the attached I used the LEED projects use WeP1 calculations done by MEP for flow rates based on occupant male vs female. The baseline water use from the calculation had larger flow rates, also energy savings are achieved by lower flow rates from the water efficient low flow hot water shower heads and faucets in the proposed. 










Jeremiah D. Crossett  | Senior Analyst  |  Phase Change Energy Solutions


120 E. Pritchard St.  | Asheboro, NC 27203 


 | Mobile 503-688-8951www.phasechange.com 


  











On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Dónal O'Connor <oconnor_dj at hotmail.com> wrote:






Hi all,



I'm looking for some guidance on how to model the domestic hot water 
load for an indoor soccer facility for LEED. The facility is scheduled 
to be open 18 hours per day, every day, with a potential changeover of 
120 people per hour (if each field has max occupancy and is rented out on an hourly basis). So, 120 people could potentially have a shower 
every hour, however, this is not realistic. I do not want to overestimate the energy savings and have 
the LEED reviewer find fault. Has anybody experience modelling a similar situation 
before?



Thanks



Dónal 		 	   		  

_______________________________________________

Bldg-sim mailing list

http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org

To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG





_______________________________________________

Bldg-sim mailing list

http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org

To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG



 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20140211/b96bdeae/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Bldg-sim mailing list