[Bldg-sim] How can Low-e glass have dramatically lower U-Value?
Randy Wilkinson
randallcwilkinson at gmail.com
Mon Jul 28 13:45:48 PDT 2014
This is exactly what I mean by asking if our energy modeling software is
inadequate. Maybe a Senior Analyst or Building Scientist can do this, I
don't think I can, or should. If it takes specialty software to model
long wave radiation coming in AND going out, then it seems like the
functionality of Window/Therm/Optics should be built into our energy
modeling software.
Thanks,
Randy
On 07/28/2014 12:03 PM, Jeremiah Crossett wrote:
> Dear Randy,
> What software are you using?
>
> To properly model window coatings you could first use a 2D FEA package
> such as Window, then for framing Therm, and for optical you could use
> Optics.
> Then you can use the 2D model results as inputs to 1D software such as
> Energy Plus.
> http://windows.lbl.gov/software/default.htm
>
> Also a nice, quick way to do analysis is to use COMFIN, (in same link)
> a graphical UI to E+ that is setup to model windows that have been
> calculated with Window/Therm/Optics.
>
>
> /
> /
> **
> **
> **
>
> Jeremiah D. Crossett***| Senior Analyst**| **LEED Green Associate *
> *
> *
>
> 120 E. Pritchard St. | Asheboro, NC 27203
>
> | Mobile 503-688-8951*
> **www.phasechange.com <http://www.phasechange.com/> **
> *
>
> **
> **
> **
> **
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:55 AM, Randy Wilkinson
> <randallcwilkinson at gmail.com <mailto:randallcwilkinson at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Bldg-Simers,
>
> I wanted to see if Low-e glass saves energy in the far North (60
> deg. N latitude or more). My thought was to use the same U-value
> for the glass, but change the SHGC to account for the difference
> in solar heat gain due to the Low-e coatings. To my surprise,
> manufacturers data for Low-e glass lists much lower U-values for
> the same double glazed units except with a Low-e coating on
> surface #3.
>
> I'm having a hard time understanding how a coating a few molecules
> thick, improves the U-value so much. The Architects in my firm
> say that the manufacturers are calculating an improved U-value to
> account for energy saved by blocking radiant heat lost (going from
> inside, out) in Winter. They surmize this is done because our
> energy loads and modeling software cannot calculate radiant heat
> loses in Winter. I'm not sure the weather data we use has hourly
> long wave radiation data that can be used to determine the
> available IR heat that can be blocked by the Low-e coating. I
> don't think our energy modeling software can account for radiant
> heat leaving the building in Winter.
>
> For example,
>
> Pilkington 1" double pane clear glass using air, has a Winter
> U-value of 0.47 Btu/hr.sq ft F and an SHGC of 0.71
>
> The same Pilkington unit with their Energy Advantage Low-e coating
> has a Winter U-value of 0.33 and an SHGC of 0.67
>
> PPG lists similar improvement for their Low-e coating
>
>
> Is our energy modeling software inadequate to accurately model the
> effects of Low-e coating on glass? Both Summer and Winter?
>
> Can we trust that the glass manufactures are giving us improved
> U-Values due to Low-e coatings that are valid?
>
> Randy Wilkinson
> Spokane, WA
> _______________________________________________
> Bldg-sim mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to
> BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
> <mailto:BLDG-SIM-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/bldg-sim-onebuilding.org/attachments/20140728/143a8c38/attachment.htm>
More information about the Bldg-sim
mailing list