[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] IFC to IDF, Geometry, Relative coordinates
At 05:16 AM 11/29/2002, Monjur M Mourshed wrote:
Walls are not connected but have an
offset of 0.19m (Half the width of the Wall ? 0.38 m).
Will that be a problem in E+ simulations, if walls are not connected?
There?s a gap of 0.19m between walls and floor/ roof. My understanding is
that, EnergyPlus is not like nodal simulation (like CFD), so it probably
takes in only Area and Volume to calculate. In this case it does not
matter if the walls/ slabs are not connected to each other. Am I right?
It should not be a problem for EnergyPlus. It might be....if you
specify Solar Distribution as FullInteriorAndExterior, but I'm not sure
tried to define zone in different ways (ArchiCAD has 3 ways to define a
zone) ? Every procedure gives me the same result.
If you take a closer look at figure 2
(bit rotated in AutoCAD to view the triangulation), you will see that
both the slabs (floor/ roof) are triangulated instead of rectangular
Is that a glitch in BSPro/ IFCtoIDF?
Just curious. Did anybody face similar problem?
I don't know the answer to that one. I'd suggest looking in the
IFCtoIDF manual to see if it is covered there. That is, it may not
be a glitch but rather a feature -- to triangulate all "flat"
surfacs would allow for non-rectangular zones to be handled the way
EnergyPlus might need them automatically but will make things a bit
strange for the simple, rectangular zones.
(You could try making an L-shaped zone and see if the floor comes out
looking reasonably correct and goes into EnergyPlus correctly).
Figure 02: Rotated
using 3D Orbit in SW Isometric view. Note the traingulation
NOTE: I guess, BSPro took wall
centreline (cL) as the wall plane. But zones are created from inside
dimensions of the wall.
There may be an option in Archicad and/or the app that reads the IFC file
that would change this interpretation of centerline vs. inside dimension
vs. outside dimenion use?
I have corrected the coordinates
(vertices) manually so that it looks like figure 03. Well, changing tens
of coordinates for this file was tiresome but possible. What if ? I have
a big building, consisting of a number of zones and hundreds and
thousands of vertices?
have any trouble if I use the IDF file (figure 01, 02 - without any
editing) and use it in simulation/ Do I have to edit the vertices so that
they are connected?
As I said above, you really should have no problem.
Owner: EnergyPlus_Support list
Member: EnergyPlus Development Team
|Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
The group web site is:
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.