A philosophical consideration:
Putting too much emphasis on a specific "typical"
meteorological year may distract the analyst from the fact that in 99% of all
analyses, you're modeling a very hypothetical condition.
Even though you have very specific data about the materials
of construction and lighting and HVAC ..... you have no clue about how the
building will actually be operated, whether sensors will be calibrated,
equipment operating at optimum, pressure drops of real systems will be as
calculated, and no end of other impacts / influences of a real
system.
Couple that with the
fact that this year's weather is different (sometimes greatly) from last year's
and next year... and it all gets a bit hazy. Although I appreciate using
data that's as close as possible to "real", the accumulation of errors makes
even the best model predictions plus/minus 20% on a good
day!
That said, I should assure you that I DO appreciate the
modeling tools which are available, including all the weather data, and wish
that there were more and better tools. Currently, my #1 hope in the energy
analysis arena is for better tools with which to analyze existing
buildings, including the use of the actual weather (including temps, humidity,
solar, shading, wind) for the most recent billing
periods.
Thank you Joe,
Yes, seems like micro climate conditions are quite
determinant for energy performances. Thanks anyway for your extended
answer!
Emanuele Naboni
PhD Building Science, LEED AP,
EU licensed architect
+1.510.395.7241
Please consider the
environment before printing this email.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Joe Huang <joe@drawbdl.com> wrote:
Emanuele,
Yes, there are many microclimates in San Francisco, but
unfortunately only two active weather stations - one at SFO and the other
at the Civic Center. This reminds me of some work I did about 15 years
trying to simulate a building at the San Francisco Presidio, and
looking around for a better weather file. There used to be a station
at the Presidio, but that's been defunct for 30+ years. The other
possibilities are to go up and down the coast, and find some
station with data, such as Arena Point, etc., but then you're trading
off geographical distance and sparseness of data against closeness to
the coast. You could also cull local sources of weather data, such as
PG&E or CMIS. Or, you might be able to get sparse data, i.e., max/min
temperatures, etc. (I have a set from EarthInfo that I haven't looked
at yet), for a closer stations and then run that against the detailed
hourly data from a first-order station to "learn" the pertubations
and get a hourly data set, but that's a research project (ASHRAE Weather
Committee is actually working on a Work Statement (RFP) in this
area).
Joe Huang White Box Technologies
Emanuele Naboni wrote: > > Dear
All, > > Is there anyone that could suggest a weather file for
Park Merced > (close to lake Merced - south San Francisco)? >
The weather is very particular over there and San Francisco airport >
data seems to be not appropriate. > > Thanks you so
much. > Regards, > > Emanuele Naboni > > PhD
Building Science, LEED AP, EU licensed architect > >
+1.510.395.7241 > > Please consider the environment before
printing this email. > >
__._,_.___
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the appropriate folder in the Files area of the Support Web Site.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
__,_._,___
|