[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[EnergyPlus_Support] Re: Simulation of a water pipe



Ok, I think that the conductive heat loss is quite insignificant due to the pipe's small thickness. 
The problem with my simulation is that the heat loss rate variable returns wrong values: in a day in February I have a heat loss of 3,3 kWh over 12 hours (with an outdoor average temp of 1.6°C), in July I have 23°C of outdoor temperature and a heat loss of 157 kWh. 
I can't find what's wrong with the model. I'm uploading the idf file, maybe you can check it and tell me if there is any mistake.
The filename is "Scivolo1L2.idf".

Thank you very much.

Stefano


--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Edwin Lee <leeed2001@...> wrote:
>
> Stefano:
> The pipe does both conductive and convective heat losses.  The significance
> of these will depend on your configuration.  If you use insulation on your
> pipe, the conductive heat transfer resistance will be much higher than the
> convective resistance, and vice-versa.  I took the example file for the
> pipe:outdoor object, change the insulation and pipe steel conductivity to
> both higher values, and noticed a significant change in the heat transfer
> rate.  In the overall scheme of the plant, the chiller loads were not
> altered drastically, but the pipe heat transfer changed up to 10 fold.  If
> you play around with your parameters, you should notice similar effects.
> 
> Edwin
> 
> On Tue, May 12, 2009 at 4:15 AM, Stefano Galli <ste_gallo82@...>wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > Hi, I'm still working on this simulation: I'm simulating with only water in
> > the pipe and trying to model the real situation of the heat exchange by
> > varying the waterflow, as you suggested.
> > I found out that the outdoor pipe simulates only a convective heat
> > exchange: in the Engineering Reference (page 687) the equation that
> > describes the model uses the film convective resistance, but ignores the
> > pipe's material conductivity. In fact, if I change the material's lambda
> > value, the heat loss value does not change.
> > Is this correct?
> > How can I simulate the pipe with both convective and conductive losses?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> > Stefano
> >
> >
> > --- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<EnergyPlus_Support%40yahoogroups.com>,
> > Edwin Lee <leeed2001@> wrote:
> > >
> > > Not sure if you are still working with this issue or not. The pipe heat
> > > transfer object can definitely only handle one fluid running through it.
> > > You may be able to make a good estimate at the loss by running a custom
> > > fluid through the pipe using manually generated glycol data for density,
> > > specific heat, and conductivity. This could be a weighted average
> > assuming
> > > the air and water are close to isothermal at each point along the length
> > of
> > > the pipe. The work to generate this data may not be worth it, so you may
> > > also consider running the pipe with a large flow of water, and then with
> > a
> > > very small flow of water. Look at the bounds of the heat loss and make an
> > > estimate. This neglects the air, but should get in the ballpark.
> > > Edwin
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 3:02 AM, Stefano Galli <ste_gallo82@>wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hello, I am trying to calculate the thermal loss of an external pipe
> > > > installed in an aquatic amusement park.
> > > > The pipe is not totally filled with water: just a small amount of water
> > > > flows in it. The rest of the pipe's section is occupied by air: the
> > water is
> > > > heated and has a fixed temperature. There is no control on the air
> > > > temperature in the pipe.
> > > > I need to calculate the thermal loss in order to size the heating plant
> > and
> > > > to evaluate the option of installing some sort of thermal insulation on
> > the
> > > > pipe.
> > > > Is it correct to simulate the pipe with a pipe:outdoor ? Is it possible
> > to
> > > > simulate just the small waterflow or pipes can only be totally filled
> > with
> > > > just one fluid?
> > > >
> > > > Thank you!
> > > >
> > > > Stefano
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >  
> >
>




------------------------------------

The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the appropriate folder in the Files area of the Support Web Site.

EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable.  Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/