Dear fellow modeler, If you have 115 branches and are using several splitters, you
might consider whether you really need so many branches. For
most energy models, accuracy will not be compromised significantly or at all by
combining similar zones. As an exaggerated example, imagine that you have a 200M (long!) South
zone ·
It is only offices (similar function, lighting and windows) ·
on two separate floors (both are intermediate floors with no
ground contact or roof, e.g., Floors 2 & 3 of a 4 story building) ·
It is served by a single air system. ·
Because it is so big, the designer has assigned 40 separate
zones with 40 individual temperature controls. Within a modeling program such as E+, these 40 zones can be
combined as a SINGLE zone with exactly the same results and a lot less effort
and computational time. There is some “art” to understanding when it is
appropriate to combine zones, but it is mostly driven by a good understanding
of whether the heat transfer is similar or identical between different areas. The Building Performance Team From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of kulandhaivel
muthusamy
__._,_.___ The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at: http://www.energyplus.gov The group web site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/ Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files. EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |