[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [EnergyPlus_Support] Air infiltration due to natural leakages





Are you confusing infiltration and ventilation?

During hot days in some hours it is convenient to increase ventilation (night cooling or free cooling) in order to reduce energy demand.

In my opinion you need to use simultaneously infiltration (constant?) and ventilation (modulated according internal and external temperature?)

 

Josep Solé
URSA Insulation S.A
- URALITA
European Sustainibility & Technical Manager 
Móvil +34 606 42 32 14

www.ursa.es

www.ursainsulation.com

www.uralita.com

 
P URALITA / URSA se compromete con el ahorro de energía. Antes de imprimir este mensaje asegúrese de que es necesario.


Aviso de confidencialidad
Este mensaje contiene información que puede ser confidencial y de uso restringido. Si usted no es el receptor deseado del mensaje (ni está autorizado a recibirlo por éste) no está autorizado a copiar, reenviar, o por otra parte, divulgar el mensaje o su contenido a cualquier otro. Si ha recibido este mensaje por error, por favor, notifíquenoslo inmediatamente y bórrelo de su sistema.


De: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de marcel.jekel
Enviado el: martes, 20 de julio de 2010 4:14
Para: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [EnergyPlus_Support] Air infiltration due to natural leakages

 

 

Hi,

I am a beginner on EnergyPlus and am trying to model a small house with an infiltration rate due to natural leakages of 0.5 air changes per hour (ACH).
I have set up the following in the idf file:

ZoneInfiltration:DesignFlowRate,
    Air_Leakage,             !- Name
    ZONE ONE,                !- Zone Name
    Constant,                !- Schedule Name
    AirChanges/Hour,         !- Design Flow Rate Calculation Method
    ,                        !- Design Flow Rate {m3/s}
    ,                        !- Flow per Zone Floor Area {m3/s-m2}
    ,                        !- Flow per Exterior Surface Area {m3/s-m2}
    0.5,                     !- Air Changes per Hour
    1,                       !- Constant Term Coefficient
    ,                        !- Temperature Term Coefficient
    ,                        !- Velocity Term Coefficient
    ;                        !- Velocity Squared Term Coefficient

Where the "Constant" schedule was obtained from the "schedules" data set.

I have looked at the results of the simulation with the above in place (there are no warnings), but it seems that the room remains too warm. I am aware that 0.5ACH is not much but I am suspicious that this is not being recognised. Have I correctly set this up?

Thank you in advance

Marcel



__._,_.___


Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx

The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection.  Limit attachments to small files.

EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable.  Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___