[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[EnergyPlus_Support] Re: [Equest-users] equest and energy plus outputs





As Joe and others mentioned, its really difficult to create all parameters same in both softwares.
I am still working on it .
For ex, which system should I use in equest as equivalent to unitary system in E+?
I understand its difficult to match every input and hence, getting same results is very tricky.
Thanks all for their inputs

On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Paul Diglio <paul.diglio@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I thought E+ is a free program?  I would be interested to hear from anyone who has used Google SketchUp and the Open Studio Plug-in to generate a 3D view in E+.

I would like to hear more about the discrepancies between eQuest and E+ from those who use both programs.

Paul Diglio



From: Pasha Korber-Gonzalez <pasha.pkconsulting@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: deepika khowal <deepika.khowal@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: energyplus_support <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; equest-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thu, April 28, 2011 1:27:44 AM
Subject: Re: [Equest-users] equest and energy plus outputs

Hmmm- an energy plus model showed 50% less energy use (EUI) than eQuest?   Did you use the same weather files?  (i.e. convert the EPW you used in E+ to .bin and use the same weather file in eQuest?)
 
If this is truly the case, this is unsettling as a simulator.   Wouldn't it be safer for our clients to error on the conservative side and give the eQuest results instead of the E+ results?
 
Also--if this is the case, then what is the market advantage to spending thousands of dollars on E+ software rather than use the FREE-ware eQuest program??
 
I'd appreciate any commentary to help me "see the light" of this topic.  And if Deepika is willing to share a visual of his energy results output, I'm super curious to see what it is showing...
 
Good question/good info...thanks,
Pasha
 
Korber Energy Consultants


 
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 7:11 PM, deepika khowal <deepika.khowal@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Joe
Even I realized the same thing. the total energy use in Energy plus was almost 50% less than equest.
If this is the case, who would you know that you model is working fine?


On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Joe Huang <yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I was involved in a two year project 2005-2007 to convert the Calif. Energy Commission's Title-24 certification suite of building tests from DOE-2.1E to EnergyPlus.  There are some areas where it's difficult to get comparable inputs due to differences or limitations in the models. The differences between the two programs varied a lot depending on the building, weather, and HVAC system. For the CEC certification suite of 160 runs, cooling results were more consistent, within 10% in most cases, with EnergyPlus almost always on the high side; for heating, the differences were much greater, sometimes with EnergyPlus being 40-60% lower than DOE-2.1E.  I have a 120-page report on this comparison, but haven't bothered to put it on the Web.

Joe

Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.whiteboxtechnologies.com
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"



deepika khowal wrote:
HI All
I am trying to create same model in equest and energy plus to see whether i see same results and just to validate my simulation files.
has anyone done this before?
I would like to know what is the % difference in both software outputs?
Thanks
Deepika
------------------------------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 


_______________________________________________
Equest-users mailing list
http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





__._,_.___


Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx

The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups..yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection.  Limit attachments to small files.

EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable.  Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___





=======
Email scanned by PC Tools - No viruses or spyware found.
(Email Guard: 7.0.0.21, Virus/Spyware Database: 6.17390)
http://www.pctools.com
=======