I've always thought it was a "no-brainer" to use actual weather data
whenever you're comparing simulation results to actual consumption
data. Even with the earliest degree-day software such as PRISM (Princeton Scorekeeping Method) in the 1980's, it was stressed to use the degree days from the period of record, and not the long-term average, so I'm not sure why this (using actual year weather data) is such a revelation. The variation in total energy consumption of course depends a lot on the building characteristics. Back in 1996, Dru Crawley and I wrote a paper on "Does it matter which weather data you use in energy simulations?", for the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (it also appeared as two separate ASHRAE papers at around the same time) where we took some prototypical building models (Dru did commercial, I did residential) and ran them with various "typical year" weather files and also 25 years of historical data in 10-12 US locations. Joe Joe Huang White Box Technologies, Inc. 346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D Moraga CA 94556 yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx www.whiteboxtechnologies.com (o) (925)388-0265 (c) (510)928-2683 "building energy simulations at your fingertips" On 6/28/2012 8:49 AM, Jim Dirkes wrote:
|