This document may contain valuable information proprietary to CleanTech Analytics which is private and confidential. It may not be shared, copied, stored or transmitted in any form without the prior written consent of CleanTech Analytics
Thank you for your reply, but... no.
I mean that the temperature under a tree is real deference from under a shading device.
The tree chance the climatic around it.> *Jeremiah D. Crossett*
--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, CleanTech Analytics <jeremiah@...> wrote:
>
> Are you referring to wind blockage in addition to shading? If so I guess
> you could change your wind coefficient based on assumptions..
>
>
>
> *CleanTech Analytics*
> *503-688-8951*
> *www.cleantechanalytics.com* <http://www.cleantechanalytics.com>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 11:06 PM, Robin Cris <robin.cris@...> wrote:
>
>
> *
>
> This document may contain valuable information proprietary to CleanTech
> Analytics which is private and confidential. It may not be shared, copied,
> stored or transmitted in any form without the prior written consent of
> CleanTech Analytics
> *
>
>
>
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > Hello
> >
> > As much as I know, E+ use trees only as Shading surfaces, and do not use
> > them to calculate the climate changes they do.
> >
> > If I stand under the a full Shading surfaces or under trees, it's very
> > very different.
> >
> > Does anyone know a way to take that into a count?
> >
> > Thank you
> >
> >
> >
>
__._,_.___