Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Re: material conductivity troublel

[Jeremiah Crossett <jcrossett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well- then you might want to try with all the same numbers for density, specific heat, thickness, thermal absorbance, solar absorbance, visible absorbace and have the same orientation within your IDF. Then run the two files with each option and plot a chart showing the difference. Post the chart IDF's back here.

Jeremiah D. Crossett  | Senior Analyst  |  Phase Change Energy Solutions

120 E. Pritchard St.  | Asheboro, NC 27203  | Mobile 503-688-8951

www.phasechange.com 

  

On Sat, Nov 3, 2012 at 8:26 AM, ricardo_meller <rbmeller@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 

Thanks for answering, but as u can see, cellular´s specific heat is higher than "concreto". And I already tried to modify this property to be the same than "concreto" (1000J/kg.K). But the results are still higher than "concreto". I think is all about the conductivity. I really don´t get it.

__._,_.___

Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx

The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection.  Limit attachments to small files.

EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable.  Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.

Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___