[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[EnergyPlus_Support] Input schedule compared to simulated temperatures
- To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [EnergyPlus_Support] Input schedule compared to simulated temperatures
- From: cgomez0000@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 18:49:09 -0500
- Delivered-to: mailing list EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Sun, 13 Jan 2013 16:49:15 -0700
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1358120955; bh=m1p9Aw//z76yvUt2JGxY2Jhb3x+2ndEKYOoU1WGu9Rk=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Received:X-Mailer:Message-Id:To:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gPjQVJc4fyVdhr0QoLOeT+U7wIYeO/ledX7s2YqQbrCbH/XpIiYUMhyqXD69+WyKYr0symQv/bdwV5k/iV7jUiLg6BNxrXX0e4546muW+mJrOzVvylOdpMgUH1VF0wNcpMb4Gr8GLfS9bFmBso/gUhCsLV3TX85Q7nxWxGwsn4U=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=JCZgru+kac3mVVITiECkQgqFHZaizn5/oIrzA+tvEE8PiuQ7vXqcdJDbUuOJV/NrqbypMwbafYf6oo1yR84/bLb+5adjC5umTbrZPHB8cJdqqLnki8yesWumB2W3e5DFt4yRxvdqZ8LHjgIk6gF+ZhfzYp05PuYfK+TeFIVh7og=;
- Envelope-to: linda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- List-id: <EnergyPlus_Support.yahoogroups.com>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
- Mailing-list: list EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; contact EnergyPlus_Support-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I have a couple of questions about expectations for simulated results. Please comment if you understand them and can assist.
I inputted a schedule of hourly temperatures to be referenced in energy plus. The results of indoor air temperature for an apt was almost exact but shifted one hour ahead of the input schedule. The input schedule began at 1am on jan 1. The next day the first time is 12am. Can you explain what may be causing the discrepancy?
The other question is related to how close it matched the schedule, very well. However, The setbacks in a field experiments show that with only heating on the decline in temperature cannot drop as fast as the schedule- unless cooling is taking place. It appears that cooling is occurring then. I set the setpoint for cooling very low 0 degrees C so that it would not take place. Can you explain how I can better model for hearing and see a closer approximation of natural cooling that takes time to reach the setback.
Thanks!
Carla
Sent from my iPhone
------------------------------------
Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
EnergyPlus_Support-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
EnergyPlus_Support-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/