[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[EnergyPlus_Support] Re: CFT or finite differences?
- To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [EnergyPlus_Support] Re: CFT or finite differences?
- From: "FrancescoP" <direzionecontraria@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 17:56:14 -0000
- Delivered-to: mailing list EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Fri, 29 Mar 2013 11:56:17 -0600
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1364579776; bh=f/o6oIBOJx8laj3wqR7U9axzIOgjddn5UU15B+xoUzc=; h=Received:Received:X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Sender:X-Apparently-To:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:X-Received:To:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:User-Agent:X-Mailer:X-Originating-IP:X-eGroups-Msg-Info:X-Yahoo-Post-IP:From:X-Yahoo-Profile:Sender:MIME-Version:Mailing-List:Delivered-To:List-Id:Precedence:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=MZvJT/lF0AQr2ptsTanEc37TWioRgsWoOvg4M3iPHIdjchEsp2mIANUz6onuuyR1wjuRRKnaZFVVi31VuAc+onn95r9iUTvqy/7t1jgRtEM8opLKWn/rpFcsOGtc+KXqgZnvBmfc+C0yTiNk4+vk0c40gwMUFWqB8nNrjf29tJA=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=echoe; d=yahoogroups.com; b=X+ArUXiy6db32h0DQWzNiVd9pYK0TaNmIf2+Q3ZazxzlyEVcno5S9er/8BXtgepnjgOkmgYJ8LK3dN7A3UWOfki29liIqBYletgE/eU82s6Nze97bJdzI6yLGma6fbD1ymqrmQ8qn/XNiIjeADUC88WjUtOrcPma4dvzEW9voyg=;
- Envelope-to: linda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <kj4j46+4j2a@eGroups.com>
- List-id: <EnergyPlus_Support.yahoogroups.com>
- List-unsubscribe: <mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>
- Mailing-list: list EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; contact EnergyPlus_Support-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: eGroups-EW/0.82
ERRATUM: CFT -> Conduction Transfer Functions (CTF)
--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "FrancescoP" <direzionecontraria@...> wrote:
>
> In order to optimize a wall from the energy point of view I want to simulate a conditioned building with many simulations. For every simulation the caracteristcs of the wall (thermal transmittance, heat capicty, order of the layers, and so on) will be different. I am going to evaluate no phase-change material (I am going to evaluate only concrete, thermal insulation, bricks).
> I wonder whether the finite difference (CFD method) gives a more accurate result than the CFT method. Is the difference between the two methods great for such a kind of simulations?
> The wall is stricken by solar radiation.
> With Regards
>
------------------------------------
Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
EnergyPlus_Support-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
EnergyPlus_Support-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/