[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Re: VRF document for creating performance curves





I recall there was some confusion a while back on the EIR chillers.
VRF and EIR Chillers use the same equations. So both VRF and EIR chillers use a EIRfPLR term that is actually a power ratio term. This term is somewhat misleading.

VRF uses (V7.2 pg 861):
 
CoolingPower = (Qrated * VRFCoolCapFT / COPcooling, ref) * VRFCoolEIRFT * VRFEIRFPLR * VRFRTF

And EIR Chillers use:

Qactual = Qref*ChillerCapFTemp (V7.2 pg 548)

Pchiller = (Qactual/COPref) * ChillerEIRFPLR * ChillerEIRFT * FRAC (V7.2 pg 549)


If you substitute Qactual into the Pchiller equation you get:

Pchiller = (Qref*ChillerCapFT)/COPref * ChillerEIRFT * ChillerEIRFPLR * FRAC

You can see that these are the same equations.

FRAC and VRFRTF here mean the same thing, this is the cycling ratio or on off cycling of the chiller or VRF compressor.

The EIRFT curve is normalized to EIRrated (EIRoperating / EIRrated).

The EIRfPLR term is actually Poperating / Prated.

What these equations do is to calculate the full load power at the actual operating conditions (i.e., operating temperatures) and then multiply by a fraction (EIRfPLR) to get the actual power at the operating PLR. If the unit is cycling on and off, the FRAC or RTF term accounts for that cycling. If the units are operating the entire time step, FRAC and RTF = 1.

I hope this helps.

On 4/11/2013 3:37 AM, Marlon wrote:

Hi Sir Richard,

I have been using  the document "FSEC-CR-1910-12" as a guide for modeling the VRF system and I find it really helpful. I just have a question on the section of creating a EIRfPLR curve because the way it has been normalized is done simply by taking the ratio of cooling power and rated cooling power (eg., 4 Kw / 9.73 Kw ). Whereas the normalized EIRfPLR for chiller is computed by taking the ratio of (EIR at part load) / (EIR at rated condition). It was kind of  confusing the way it is done, is the EIR computation is really different for chiller and VRF. Hoping for clarification.

Thanks and Kind Regards,

Marlon


 EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Richard Raustad <RRaustad@...> wrote:
>
> A mistake was found in the EIRfPLR curves and has been corrected. If you
> are using this document to create performance curves for VRF equipment,
> please use the latest version.
>
> http://www.fsec.ucf.edu/en/publications/pdf/FSEC-CR-1910-12.pdf
>
> --
> Richard A. Raustad
> Senior Research Engineer
> Florida Solar Energy Center
> University of Central Florida
> 1679 Clearlake Road
> Cocoa, FL 32922-5703
> Phone: (321) 638-1454
> Fax: (321) 638-1439 or 1010
> Visit our web site at: http://www.fsec.ucf.edu
>
> UCF - From Promise to Prominence: Celebrating 40 Years
>


-- 
Richard A. Raustad
Senior Research Engineer
Florida Solar Energy Center
University of Central Florida
1679 Clearlake Road
Cocoa, FL  32922-5703
Phone:   (321) 638-1454
Fax:     (321) 638-1439 or 1010
Visit our web site at: http://www.fsec.ucf.edu

UCF - From Promise to Prominence: Celebrating 50 Years


__._,_.___


Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx

The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection.  Limit attachments to small files.

EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable.  Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___