A small correction to what I had written below to avoid any
appearance of contradiction:
In the second paragraph, "These are actually the heat flows..."
refer to heat flows that have been "weighted" using Weighting
Factors, i.e., they have been translated from heat flows to space
loads.
in the last sentence, the "component heat flows" refer to the heat
flows in EnergyPlus that have not been translated to space loads.
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 12/11/2013 1:12 PM, Joe Huang wrote:
Seeing as how there haven't been any responses to Rodrigo's
question, I'll take a shot at it, but bear in mind that I haven't
pondered this aspect of EnergyPlus for over ten years and might be
outdated in my perceptions. If anyone has a better answer, please
correct me.
There's not a quick answer, because DOE-2 (the engine behind
eQUEST) and EnergyPlus work differently, so that you can't always
get the same reports. For the benefit of those unfamiliar with
DOE-2, the LS-B report gives the component loads breakdown (wall,
roof, lights, etc.) for the days with the largest heating and
cooling loads. These are actually the heat flows to the spaces
calculated by DOE-2's LOADS module at fixed reference
temperatures, and are approximate since the true indoor
temperatures are not solved until the following SYSTEMS module.
EnergyPlus, however, does not distinguish between LOADS and
SYSTEMS, but simulates both within each time step. Thus, if you
ran EnergyPlus with just the building model, you will not get the
reference loads (in the DOE-2 sense), but the floating building
conditions with neither heating nor cooling. If you want to get
something similar to the LS-B report, you will have to add a
fictitious system (used to be called PurchasedAir) and then set
the heating and cooling setpoints to the same reference
temperature as you would have used in DOE-2 (preferably the annual
average indoor temperature). You can then find the days with the
largest heating and cooling loads. But if you have to go through
all this effort, why not simply use the actual thermostat
schedules, which should give you more accurate peak loads,
particularly for commercial buildings with intermittent
operations? Lastly, don't expect to get the component loads as in
the LS-B report, because EnergyPlus doesn't work that way (for
those who like to quibble, yes you can get the component heat
flows, but that's not the same as the loads).
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 12/10/2013 1:01 PM, Rodrigo Cerqueira wrote:
Hi,
I’m new in
Energy Plus and I want start to use it to load
calculations. I used to do that in eQuest. Can I
have a report like LS-B (DOE2)? Normally in eQuest,
I make just the shell model, with the zone internal
loads and I run the simulation to get the peak
heating and cooling loads. Can I do the same with
Energy Plus? if so, which variable should I select
to get the results?
Thank’s
Rodrigo
__._,_.___
Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
__,_._,___
|