Yes, but to have a radiant loop in the surface would require the same construction and thus algorithm selection. Â
ÂOh! I didn't mean on the same construction. Just that you can assign a different method to different constructions within the same simulation.Mit freundlichen GrüÃ?en- Sent from my iPhone (excuse the brevity)i. A.Jean Maraisb.i.g. bechtoldTel.  +49 30 6706662-23
On 01.06.2015, at 23:04, "Jeremiah Crossett jcrossett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support]" <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:ÂMy experience is that once choosing Conduction Finite Difference on the surface or construction level that it overrides the Conduction Transfer Function choice.â??â??Jeremiah D. Crossett  | Applications Engineer  | LEED Green Associate ÂOn Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 2:01 PM, Linda Lawrie linda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support] <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:ÂI believe so but I'd ask the question of the helpdesk to be sure.
At 02:26 PM 5/29/2015, shahabsherafat@xxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
Hi,
I want to simulate a room with a Radiant cooling system in ceiling and
PCM(phase change material) boards in walls..
Is it possible to choose a "Conduction Finite Difference" algorithm in "Heat Balance Algorithm"
[to take into account PCMs] AND! also use a "Conduction Transfer Function" algorithm
in "Surface Property:Heat Transfer Algorithm" for ceiling surface or ceiling construction, to calculate
Radiant cooling effects?
Thank's alot
__._,_.___