[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Digest Number 4986 [2 Attachments]
I will be out of the office on leave until the 4th October. If you need to urgently get hold of me please send me a text message or call 00447503775874.
On 29 Sep 2015, at 10:50, EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
EnergyPlus Support Group
7 Messages
Digest #4986
1a
Eplusout.eso does not exist. ReadVarsESO program terminated. Help??? by alegorga
1b
Re: Eplusout.eso does not exist. ReadVarsESO program terminated. Hel by "Chandan Sharma" chandansharma101
2
Lancering METIZ by "Geert Bellens" geertbellens
3a
Re: Airflow network compared to ZoneInfiltration:Effective Leakage A by rueboudreaux
4a
Best way to represent openings by sm.ibag
4b
Re: Best way to represent openings by "Jean Marais" jeannieboef
5a
Re: How exactly EnergyPlus calculates the primary airflow rate in co by "Jean Marais" jeannieboef
Messages
1a
Eplusout.eso does not exist. ReadVarsESO program terminated. Help???
Mon Sep 28, 2015 4:50 am (PDT) . Posted by:
alegorga
Dear all
It is my first experience with Energyplus 8.3. I´m trying to simulate the file minimal and unfortunately occurs the follow error. Can anyone help me to solve this?
I´ve already tried to install old version but the problem remain
ReadVarsESO
Requested ESO file=eplusout.eso
does not exist. ReadVarsESO program terminated.
ReadVarsESO program terminated.
ReadVarsESO
processing:test.mvi
Requested ESO file=eplusout.mtr
does not exist. ReadVarsESO program terminated.
ReadVarsESO program terminated.
Thanks
Alexandre
Reply to sender . Reply to group . Reply via Web Post . All Messages (2) . Top ^
1b
Re: Eplusout.eso does not exist. ReadVarsESO program terminated. Hel
Mon Sep 28, 2015 5:53 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Chandan Sharma" chandansharma101
Does the input file (*.idf) have "Output:Variable:" objects such as below?
Output:Variable,*,Site Outdoor Air Drybulb Temperature,hourly; !- Zone
Average [C]
On Sun, Sep 27, 2015 at 3:39 AM, alegorga@xxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support] <
EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Dear all
>
>
> It is my first experience with Energyplus 8.3. I´m trying to simulate the
> file minimal and unfortunately occurs the follow error. Can anyone help me
> to solve this?
>
> I´ve already tried to install old version but the problem remain
>
>
> ReadVarsESO
>
> Requested ESO file=eplusout.eso
>
> does not exist. ReadVarsESO program terminated.
>
> ReadVarsESO program terminated.
>
> ReadVarsESO
>
> processing:test.mvi
>
> Requested ESO file=eplusout.mtr
>
> does not exist. ReadVarsESO program terminated.
>
> ReadVarsESO program terminated.
>
> Thanks
>
> Alexandre
>
>
>
>
Reply to sender . Reply to group . Reply via Web Post . All Messages (2) . Top ^
2
Lancering METIZ
Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:03 am (PDT) . Posted by:
"Geert Bellens" geertbellens
![0001.jpg][1]
Bestbuildingconcept heeft in de vakantie niet stilgezeten. Zo
lanceren we bijvoorbeeld een gloednieuwe dienst, in samenwerking
met een zeer ervaren partner én gaan we een iconische Antwerpse
woontoren monitoren.
![0002.jpg][2]
Nieuw! METIZ
In kwetsbare gebouwen of gebouwen met een kostbare inhoud is het
binnenklimaat super belangrijk.
METIZ, een initiatief van Bestbuildingconcept en ingenieur Tim
Van Dyck (stad Antwerpen) zorgt sinds kort voor een kant en klare
oplossing.
METIZ bewaakt permanent het binnenklimaat in historische
gebouwen, musea, archieven, maar ook in kantoren en scholen.
Via een abonnementssysteem is de klant verzekerd van een continue
binnenklimaatbewaking, zonder investering.
Alarmering, rapporten, overleg ter plaatse,onderhoud,
kalibratie... alles zit in één duidelijke prijs. Een totale
ontzorging van de klimaatbewaking dus.
![0003.jpg][3]
![0004.jpg][4]
[M][5][eer info][5][ op w][5][ww.metiz.be][5]
![0005.jpg][6]
Draadloze opvolging woontoren
Bestbuildingconcept is gespecialiseerd in draadloze monitoring
van comfort, binnenklimaat, temperaturen van leidingen,
energiemeters etc...
Op vraag van de hogeschool Thomas More zijn we een woontoren gaan
monitoren als test. Dit om een toekomstig project van
semi-permanente monitoring te valideren.
Een meetfrequentie van +- 1 meting per 2 seconden was
noodzakelijk, op verschillende verdiepingen, net zoals beheer van
de metingen van op afstand.
De test is goed verlopen en het komende jaar zullen permanent
watertemperaturen door onze draadloze monitoring naar de cloud
gestuurd worden.
![0006.jpg][7]
[M][8][eer info][8][ op de website][8]
Dynamische simulaties: ervaring verzekerd!
Dynamische simulaties blijven onze core-business. Onze vaste
klanten weten dat 10 jaar ervaring met simuleren echt wel
noodzakelijk is om een snel én vooral correct resultaat af te
leveren.
Enkele opdrachten van het voorbije half jaar: Stadskantoor
Hasselt, Gemeentehuis Lille, Distributiecentrum LIDL, Acerta
kantoor Wilrijk,....
![0007.jpg][9]
![0008.jpg][10]
![0009.jpg][11]
![0010.jpg][12]
[M][13][eer info][13][ op de website][13]
Bestbuildingconcept BVBA
Bestbuildingconcept is een ingenieursbureau, opgericht door
ingenieur Geert Bellens en gekend voor zijn betaalbaarheid en
flexibiliteit. Wij zijn gespecialiseerd in het optimaliseren van
het comfort, het binnenklimaat en het energieverbruik van
niet-residentiële gebouwen.
Wij geloven sterk in advies gebaseerd op correcte cijfers
verkregen door:
**[Comfortmetingen][14]**
[**Draadloze monitoring**][14]
**[Dynamische simulaties][14]**
[![0011.jpg][16]][16]
[![0012.jpg][17]][17]
[![0013.jpg][18]][18]
Met deze diensten maken wij comfortklachten en energieverbruik op
een objectieve manier 'zichtbaar' zowel bij nieuwbouwprojecten
als bij comfortklachten in bestaande gebouwen.
U praat altijd rechtstreeks met de zaakvoerder, een ingenieur met
tien jaar ervaring in deze materie. Dat is uw garantie dat elk
project snel en efficiënt verloopt.
[M][18][eer info][18][ op de website][18]
Contact
Veel meer informatie vindt u op onze website
[www.bestbuildingconcept.be][19] of contacteer volledig
vrijblijvend [Geert.Bellens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx][20] of bel
gerust op 03/369.10.33
BESTBUILDINGCONCEPT BVBA
Zimmerplein 16
2500 LIER
GSM +32 (0)3/369.10.33
BTW BE 0848.448.805
[![0014.png][22]][22]
[![0015.png][23]][23]
[1]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/dyn/wizard/_custom/7020/78009/assets/1443448495_0001.jpg
[2]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/dyn/wizard/_custom/7020/78009/assets/1443448495_0002.jpg
[3]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/dyn/wizard/_custom/7020/78009/assets/1443448495_0003.jpg
[4]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/dyn/wizard/_custom/7020/78009/assets/1443448495_0004.jpg
[5]: http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786757-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
[6]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/dyn/wizard/_custom/7020/78009/assets/1443448495_0005.jpg
[7]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/dyn/wizard/_custom/7020/78009/assets/1443448495_0006.jpg
[8]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786747-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
[9]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/dyn/wizard/_custom/7020/78009/assets/1443448495_0007.jpg
[10]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/dyn/wizard/_custom/7020/78009/assets/1443448496_0008.jpg
[11]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/dyn/wizard/_custom/7020/78009/assets/1443448496_0009.jpg
[12]:
http://cdn.flxml.eu/dyn/wizard/_custom/7020/78009/assets/1443448496_0010.jpg
[13]: http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786745-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
[14]: http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786749-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
: http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786749-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
: http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786749-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
: http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786749-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
[18]: http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786753-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
[19]: http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786751-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
[20]:
mailto:Geert.Bellens@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=Informatie%20aanvraag
: http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786755-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
: http://cdn.flxml.eu/lt-3786759-d97c20acd71ba78532c60632006b8c80
Reply to sender . Reply to group . Reply via Web Post . All Messages (1) . Top ^
3a
Re: Airflow network compared to ZoneInfiltration:Effective Leakage A
Mon Sep 28, 2015 7:33 am (PDT) . Posted by:
rueboudreaux
Jean, I set it up by hand.
I attached the Airflow network objects. Here is the effective leakage area object that I am comparing it to:
!- === ALL OBJECTS IN CLASS: ZONEINFILTRATION:EFFECTIVELEAKAGEAREA ===========
ZoneInfiltration:EffectiveLeakageArea,
ELA, !- Name
Zone One, !- Zone Name
AChangeFile, !- Schedule Name
14806.4216068322, !- Effective Air Leakage Area {cm2}
0.00029, !- Stack Coefficient
0.000137; !- Wind Coefficient
The AChangeFile is just a column of 1's.
Thanks,
Philip
Reply to sender . Reply to group . Reply via Web Post . All Messages (5) . Top ^
4a
Best way to represent openings
Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:38 am (PDT) . Posted by:
sm.ibag
Hi everyone, I'm new to all this building energy modeling thing and I've got some doubts while creating my model. I'm modeling a real building and my objective is to simulate a green roof on it and evaluate if this modification can reduce the total eletric consumption (decreasing the use of the ACs).
I thought I should use the FullInteriorlandExterior option, and for that I created all my spaces with a convex geometry. But, many rooms got split up in many pieces, so I assigned Air Walls for the 'openings'. I've read that it transforms it into a Drywall material, so the heat is transfered, but not airflow. So I thought of using the "ZoneCrossMixing" to allow that.
My questions are:
Should I really use the ZoneCrossMixing and Air Walls to represent this openings? That way I would let them be two different thermal zones.
Should I merge the two spaces into one thermal zone? I was really afraid of all the possible problems of using Internal Mass.
Is there really a huge difference in results between FullExterior and FullInteriorandExterior? Should I forget all of the above and just use FullExterior?
I'm sorry for all these subjective questions, I have just come to a dead-end, so I thought I could use an expert advice :)
P.S: before anyone questions, this simulation is part of my thesis, but I really wanted to make it as precise as possible, since the building being simulated is from the company I am currently an Intern in ;D
Reply to sender . Reply to group . Reply via Web Post . All Messages (2) . Top ^
4b
Re: Best way to represent openings
Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:31 pm (PDT) . Posted by:
"Jean Marais" jeannieboef
Don't worry. You are asking good questions. If you were investigating
something like a daylighting savings program requiring good simulation of
indoor lighting levels for the photo sensors to be representative, then the
full interior and exterior option is for you. As you are interested in an
exterior roof, it is probably less important.
That being said, the user comfort can be better captured if you subdivide
the zones as you have. In some situations, especially the placement of
thermostats and zone HVAC this could be important.
Cross-mixing was the correct idea. Usually the amount is large and
sufficient to ensure a well mixed zone(s).
I want to leave one thought with you:
Simulations are most powerful when they are comparing two identical models
where one parameter varies. Then the urge to get very realistic models is
less. The simulations will tell you A is better than B. This is where the
programs are most powerful. This is "qualitive".
The next level is to ask 'how much better is A than B'. This is
"quantitive". How exact the answer to this is depends on many large
assumptions. And so the answer is more often than not quasi-quantitive in
that you gain an idea of the magnitudes of the results. Many people forget
that. We have to choose that right kind of investigation at the right time.
On 28 Sep 2015 6:38 pm, "sm.ibag@xxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support]" <
EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hi everyone, I'm new to all this building energy modeling thing and I've
> got some doubts while creating my model. I'm modeling a real building and
> my objective is to simulate a green roof on it and evaluate if this
> modification can reduce the total eletric consumption (decreasing the use
> of the ACs).
>
> I thought I should use the FullInteriorlandExterior option, and for that I
> created all my spaces with a convex geometry. But, many rooms got split up
> in many pieces, so I assigned Air Walls for the 'openings'. I've read that
> it transforms it into a Drywall material, so the heat is transfered, but
> not airflow. So I thought of using the "ZoneCrossMixing" to allow that.
>
> My questions are:
>
> 1.
>
> Should I really use the ZoneCrossMixing and Air Walls to represent
> this openings? That way I would let them be two different thermal zones.
> 2.
>
> Should I merge the two spaces into one thermal zone? I was really
> afraid of all the possible problems of using Internal Mass.
> 3.
>
> Is there really a huge difference in results between FullExterior and
> FullInteriorandExterior? Should I forget all of the above and just use
> FullExterior?
>
> I'm sorry for all these subjective questions, I have just come to a
> dead-end, so I thought I could use an expert advice :)
>
> P.S: before anyone questions, this simulation is part of my thesis, but I
> really wanted to make it as precise as possible, since the building being
> simulated is from the company I am currently an Intern in ;D
>
>
>
>
Reply to sender . Reply to group . Reply via Web Post . All Messages (2) . Top ^
5a
Re: How exactly EnergyPlus calculates the primary airflow rate in co
Mon Sep 28, 2015 9:20 pm (PDT) . Posted by:
"Jean Marais" jeannieboef
Normally, maximum rates for massflows through damper or valve type
equipment are set by the maximum rates required during the design day
simulations + the user specified sizing factor. The airflow rates are, of
course, quite dependent on the user specified delivery air temperature and
humidity (because an ideal air system is used for this part of the sizing
simulations, not the detailed equipment specified).
On 24 Sep 2015 11:55 pm, "Solomon Yin solomonyp@xxxxxxxxxxx
[EnergyPlus_Support]" <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I have a question on the calculation of primary airflow rate for series
> PIU when the cooling is required. A brief calculation procedure is
> introduced in the engineering manual page 406. My question is what are the
> other constrains that regulate the primary airflow rate besides the zone
> load and the minimum primary air fraction that you manually set?
>
> Thanks
>
> Solomon
>
>
Reply to sender . Reply to group . Reply via Web Post . All Messages (2) . Top ^
Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
VISIT YOUR GROUP New Members 10
? Privacy ? Unsubscribe ? Terms of Use
Attachment not found:
D:\Eudora\Attach\logo-groups-137x153.png
Attachment not found:
D:\Eudora\Attach\logo-groups-transparent-180x403.png