I think my "personal record" was for a LEED project which had over 3,000,000 warnings. I cannot remember the root cause of those warnings, but I'm fairly sure they were psychrometric warnings like you describe.I believe that the key is to demonstrate that you fully understand the warnings and their relevance ... and what causes them ... and that they do not compromise the energy model's results.Certain HVAC systems, like DOAS, tend to produce high numbers of psychrometric warnings. Some are OK, but you should do some investigation to make sure your model is well-defined and not causing warnings needlessly.On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 8:47 PM, hidayah.annisanurul@xxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support] <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Hi Guys,I am working on a LEED project just now. I have to fill in the Eap 2 form, and I found that I have to fill the number of warning message. Currently, I am using EnergyPlus as the simulation program. And my simulation result shows that my model gets to many warning message, more than 1,000,000. Is that any limitation, like maximum number of warning message that can be accepted by the LEED reviewer? the main number of warning come from the relative humidity and enthalphy that out of range. Or in that case, should I remake the model?Thank You--James V Dirkes II, PE, BEMP, LEED AP
CEO/President
The Building Performance Team Inc.
1631 Acacia Dr, GR, Mi 49504
Direct: 616.450.8653
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Website l LinkedInLove is the bridge over which Truth travels