Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Coil:Cooling:DX:TwoSpeed and SHR

On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:34 AM, 'Edward G. Lyon' eglyon@xxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support] <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Â

Thanks for your full explanationâ?¦I agree?my issue is that the inputs for a two speed D coil arre not following the game plan.Â Increasing SHR stops humidity calculation errors?

Â

Ned Lyon, P.E. (MA, WV)
Staff Consultant

SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER
781.907.9000Â main
781.907.9350 directÂ
617.285.2162 mobileÂ
781.907.9009Â fax
www.sgh.com

Send Files

From: EnergyPlus_Support@yahoogroups.com [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@yahoogroups.com]
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 4:05 PM
To: EnergyPlus_Support@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Coil:Cooling:DX:TwoSpeed and SHR

Â

Â

Edward,

Â

DX cooling coils that are running at lower speed, which also implies lower supply air flow rate, is expected to have lower SHR compared to higher speed. The main reason is that the whole coil surface area is available for lower supply air flow, hence a better coil surface and air contact that enhances moisture removal. When the air has more contact with the cold coil surface, the fraction of supply air approaching the apparatus dew point increases, which enhances de-humidification potential.

Â

Some humidity control features of DX system allow the supply fan to run at reduced supply air flow rate to enhance de-humidification potential. Â Â Â

Â

Hope this helps,Â

Bereket

Â

Â

From: "'Edward G. Lyon' eglyon@xxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support]" <EnergyPlus_Support@yahoogroups.com>
To: "'EnergyPlus_Support@yahoogroups.com'" <EnergyPlus_Support@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, June 30, 2017 3:18 PM
Subject: [EnergyPlus_Support] Coil:Cooling:DX:TwoSpeed and SHR

Â

Â

I am modeling an existing building with several roof top VAV systems.Â I have system model numbers so I did not autosize any of the Coil:Cooling:DX:TwoSpeed system.Â The SHR inputs for the model and error messages running the model make no sense to me:

Â

Manufacturer data says SHR at low speed is much lower than at high speed (makes perfect sense to me), but E+ complains if the high speed and low speed SHR differ too much.

Â

Using manufacturer data to calculate SHR inputs results in psychrometric calculation errors about RH exceeding 100%.Â While the error message would suggest that more latent cooling is needed (lower SHR) the actual fix is to increase the SHR (less latent cooling).

Â

So my model runs now runs without complaints with high speed SHR = low speed SHR = 0.77, not close to the manufacturer data. I would appreciate it if anyone could explain this E+ logic to me this. Â Â Â

Â

Ned Lyon, P.E. (MA, WV)
Staff Consultant

SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGERÂ
Â Â Â Â | Engineering of Structures and Building Enclosures

41 Seyon Street, Building 1, Suite 500
Waltham, MA 02453

781.907.9000Â main
781.907.9350 directÂ
617.285.2162 mobileÂ
781.907.9009Â fax
www.sgh.com

Send Files

Â

James V Dirkes II,Â CEO / President
The Building Performance Team Inc.
1631 Acacia Dr, GR, MI 49504

(alphabet soup of efforts for excellence: PE, BEMP, BCxP, LEED AP)

Direct / Mobile: 616.450.8653
jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Website l Â LinkedIn

Coffee conversation: They love truth when it enlightens them, they hate truth when it accuses them? They love truth when it reveals itself, and hatte it when it reveals them.