[Equest-users] Details report

[Steve Mignogna]

I do not think the two reports are switched.  The main difference between
the two is that the SS-D report is the total coil loads that the system
sees, this includes outside air, duct losses, etc...

On Fri, Feb 13, 2009 at 12:08 AM, Karl Stum <kstum at summitbe.com> wrote:

>  Don't you have the two reports switched? By the numbers that's what it
> appears. You say the SS-D is sensible + latent and the LS-D is sensible
> only, but the numbers and the report abbrev seem to say they're switched.
>
>
>
> ____________________________
>
> Karl Stum, PE
>
> 360 573 5700 ofc
> 360 771 0918 cell
>
> Summit Building Engineering
>   ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Steve Mignogna [mailto:smignogna at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, February 12, 2009 1:01 PM
> *To:* fposer at libero.it
> *Cc:* equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Equest-users] Details report
>
>
>
> Here are two screenshots explaining the differences between the two
> reports.  Does this answer your question?  If not I will explain in more
> detail.
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:49 AM, fposer at libero.it <fposer at libero.it>
> wrote:
>
>  Hi folks,
>
> i have a question for you.
>
> Comparing the "REPORT – SS-D Building
> HVAC Load Summary" with the "REPORT – LS-D Building Monthly Loads Summary"
>  I'
> ve noticed that the values of heating and cooling energy are different
> between
> the two reports. Why it's happen? What's the difference between the two
> reports?
>
> Thanks a lot.
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send  a blank message to
> EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>
>
>
>
> --
> Steve Mignogna
> Atelier Ten
>



-- 
Steve Mignogna
Atelier Ten
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20090217/9dcf8957/attachment-0002.htm>