[Equest-users] Unmet Hours
Patrick J. O'Leary, Jr.
poleary1969 at gmail.com
Thu Jul 7 07:56:08 PDT 2011
that would be 500 unmet hours.
the bigger leed review problem i've had is when i have more unmet hours
in one category in the proposed (like 200 unmet in cooling) and fewer
unmet hours in the other (like 0 in heating) but the baseline is
opposite. certain leed reviewers think this is a problem. the 90.1
requirement addresses the unmet hours per the entire building design
(both heating and cooling) not heating and cooling individually.
On 7/7/11 7:49 AM, Brad Robinson wrote:
> For LEED compliance under ASHRAE 90.1, are the 300 unmet hours the sum
> of all the unmet hours in each zone, or the peak per zone? In other
> words if I have 250 unmet hours in one zone and 250 unmet hours in
> another zone, does this comply, or is it considered 500 unmet hours
> total? By zones, I mean thermal zones served by the same air handling
> unit. Thanks.
>
> Brad Robinson
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Equest-users mailing list
> http://lists.onebuilding.org/listinfo.cgi/equest-users-onebuilding.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list send a blank message to EQUEST-USERS-UNSUBSCRIBE at ONEBUILDING.ORG
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20110707/d2f0d053/attachment-0002.htm>
More information about the Equest-users
mailing list