[Equest-users] low lighting savings

Steven Savich ssavich at systemswestengineers.com
Tue Jan 29 08:40:19 PST 2013


Jessica,

 

What level of savings are you expecting?

It looks like the baseline model LPD is 1.0 W/SF throughout, and the
proposed model is 0.61 W/SF in most spaces, with some at 0.68.  That should
be nearly 39% savings over baseline, which is what I got when I ran the
models.

 

Places to look for add'l savings:

I don't see any difference between your models for the exterior lighting
load on energy meter 1.  

It looks like you have some zones set up for daylighting, but they're
currently not enabled.

Are the blanket 1.0 and 0.61/0.68 LPDs realistic?  Sometimes you can get
better overall savings when you go space-by-space.

The lighting schedules are identical between the models.  Will you be using
occ sensors in spaces in the proposed bldg where it's not required in the
baseline, or some other lighting control scheme that exceeds 90.1
requirements?

Is there task lighting?  Don't see anything in the equipment tab.

 

Steven

 

 

 

From: equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org
[mailto:equest-users-bounces at lists.onebuilding.org] On Behalf Of Miller,
Jessica
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 8:17 AM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] low lighting savings

 

Good morning all!

 

I am working on my LEED models and am finding that I'm not getting as much
lighting savings as expected.  Does anyone have any suggestions on some
items to look at?

 

Files are attached.

 

Thank you! 

 

Jessica K. Miller, EIT, LEEDR AP

Associate

HVAC Engineering


TRO Jung|Brannen
22 Boston Wharf Road
Boston, Massachusetts  02210

t     617.502.3400
f     617.502.3401

 <blocked::http://www.trojungbrannen.com/> www.trojungbrannen.com

 

I'm riding 192 miles for the Pan Mass Challenge <http://pmc.org/>  

to raise money for the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute.  

Please visit my fundraising page
<http://www2.pmc.org/profile/pfp.asp?profileid=JM0706>  and donate!

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20130129/88fd9456/attachment-0002.htm>


More information about the Equest-users mailing list