[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[EnergyPlus_Support] Re: Forcing system behavior





Hi Mike,

I've uploaded a couple of files (an EPMIDF and an XLS with some of 
our results). Your response leaves me puzzled because the zone 
setpoint is not being met, yet
  -> unmet demand = 0
  -> the chilled water coil deltaT at peak is only 2.4C when 5.6C is 
design/idf input
  -> the SA volume is fixed at 73 L/s (more than the bare minimum)
  -> the SA temperature is too warm because E+ says it has to be 
warmer (11.67C is idf input)
  -> the radiant panel flow is not at capacity

I wonder if you could see if you see any problems with our IDF input.

About your earlier question, I'm using COIL:Water:Cooling.

Shaun


--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Michael J. Witte" 
<mjwitte@g...> wrote:
> If the unmet demand is zero, then the plant has enough capacity to 
meet the 
> request from the chilled water coil.  If the zone setpoint is still 
not met, 
> then the chilled water coil is not delivering enough cooling.  
Either the 
> airflow rate is too low, or the supply air temperature is too 
warm.  This could 
> be a control problem, an airflow sizing problem, or a coil sizing 
problem.
> 
> Mike
> 
> 
> On 4 Dec 2004, at 0:40, sm278424 wrote:
> 
> > 
> > 
> > Thanks Mike,
> > 
> > Can I ask one further question re: zone temperatures and unmet 
demand.
> > 
> > If the unmet demand is zero, then I should have enough capacity 
in 
> > the plant loop.  
> > 
> > I have a fixed zone cooling setpoint of 23C.  But in some of our 
> > simulations we see zone air temperatures that are several degrees 
> > above our setpoint.  If the capacity is there, why would my zone 
air 
> > temp be off the setpoint?
> > 
> > Thanks again,
> > Shaun Martin
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > --- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Michael J. Witte" 
> > <mjwitte@g...> wrote:
> > > 1.  If the air loop outlet setpoint is not being met, then the 
coil 
> > capacity or 
> > > chilled water flow rate or chiller capacity is not adequate.  
Which 
> > cooling 
> > > coil model are you using?  Use COIL:Water:Cooling or 
> > > COIL:Water:DetailedFlatCooling.  COIL:Water:SimpleCooling does 
not 
> > always 
> > > deliver adequate capacity under certain conditions (this model 
will 
> > not be 
> > > available in the next release).
> > > 
> > > 2.  It is very difficult to get a hybrid forced air/radiant 
system 
> > to behave as 
> > > desired with current EnergyPlus control options.  In your case, 
if 
> > you want the 
> > > radiant system to modulate, then why use a VAV air system?  
Perhaps 
> > a constant 
> > > volume system would be better.  Also, you should set the air 
system 
> > to run as 
> > > the first cooling priority, so the radiant system can pick up 
the 
> > remaining 
> > > load.  Alternatively, perhaps the VAV system is oversized?  If 
it 
> > is sized 
> > > smaller so that it cannot meet the entire cooling load, then it 
> > will open to 
> > > full flow, thus supplying a constant volume of air.
> > > 
> > > 3.  With cool surfaces for radiant slabs, it would be expected 
that 
> > comfort is 
> > > maintained at higher dry bulb temperatures.  Check all of the 
> > comfort inputs to 
> > > make sure thay are appropriate (clothing, activity level, air 
> > velocity).
> > > 
> > > 4.  These unmet demands are why #1 is happening.  The chiller 
plant 
> > is not able 
> > > to meet the load, so the chilled water supply temperature 
rises, 
> > and then the 
> > > coil cannot meet the supply air setpoint.  Everything is 
> > simultaneous in 
> > > EnergyPlus, so unmet demands result in unmet setpoints.
> > > 
> > > 5.  Zone/Sys Sensible Heating (and Cooling) do not include 
radiant 
> > slab system 
> > > loads.  (I see we need to clarify the definition of this, or 
change 
> > the way it 
> > > is reported.)  Also, if there is outside air, that will place a 
> > load on the 
> > > cooling coil which is not included in the load delivered to the 
> > zone.
> > > 
> > > Mike
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 1 Dec 2004, at 20:48, sm278424 wrote:
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Hi, again,
> > > > 
> > > > I'm modeling a single zone with a VAV system and a radiant 
panel. 
> > I 
> > > > control the mixed air temp, HC water inlet and CC water inlet 
> > with 
> > > > the AIR LOOP OUTLET node, which is controlled by a SETPOINT 
> > MANAGER 
> > > > to a setpoint of 12.2C.
> > > > 
> > > > What happens at peak cooling load is both the radiant panel 
and 
> > the 
> > > > VAV box go to full flow, and E+ allows the AIR LOOP OUTLET 
> > > > temperature to modulate.
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > My questions:
> > > > 
> > > > 1. Is there any way to lock in the AIR LOOP OUTLET temp in 
order 
> > to 
> > > > allow the supply volume to vary? 
> > > > 
> > > > 2. Can the supply temp and volume both be locked at specific 
> > values, 
> > > > so that the radiant panel modulates more fully?  Can you 
suggest 
> > > > appropriate radiant panel schedules for this? 
> > > > 
> > > > 3. In our models we've seen the FANGER PMV produce PPD values 
of 
> > > > between 6-10% when zone mean air temperatures are relatively 
high 
> > eg 
> > > > 77-79F (the PPD formula is from the Engineering doc).  Does 
this 
> > make 
> > > > sense to you?  The comfort band seems too wide, in most 
buildings 
> > > > complaints start flowing whenever zone DB temperatures exceed 
75F.
> > > > 
> > > > 4. When we get UNMET DEMAND on our plant loops in these 
> > simulations, 
> > > > the values are very high, much more than the total zone loads 
> > would 
> > > > ever be. We can't explain the values.
> > > > 
> > > > 5. With this model the total zone load is the rad panel 
cooling 
> > rate 
> > > > + the CC rate, but the Zone/Sys Cooling Rate values are all 
over 
> > the 
> > > > place (but usually quite low). Why should this be?  
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Shaun Martin
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
> > > > http://www.energyplus.gov
> > > > 
> > > > The group web site is:
> > > > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
> > > > 
> > > > Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the 
> > appropriate folder
> > > > in the Files area of the Support Web Site.
> > > > 
> > > > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ========================================================
> > > Michael J. Witte, GARD Analytics, Inc.
> > > EnergyPlus Testing and Support      
> > > EnergyPlus-Support@g...
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
> > http://www.energyplus.gov
> > 
> > The group web site is:
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
> > 
> > Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the 
appropriate folder
> > in the Files area of the Support Web Site.
> > 
> > Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> >





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
Make a clean sweep of pop-up ads. Yahoo! Companion Toolbar.
Now with Pop-Up Blocker. Get it for free!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/L5YrjA/eSIIAA/yQLSAA/dkFolB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the appropriate folder in the Files area of the Support Web Site.
 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/