[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[EnergyPlus_Support] Re: Outward Facing Angle for a subsurface



Thanks a lot Richard. You were exactly right. I moved the first two points to the end of the list and the problems stopped. 

Now I am getting a warning that the doors contained within a wall are not fully enclosed. Should I just ignore this warning? I have enclosed a relevant extract from the IDF file.

Phil

BuildingSurface:Detailed,
    ZnWare:E_Wall,           !- Name
    Wall,                    !- Surface Type
    Exterior Wall,           !- Construction Name
    WarehouseZone,           !- Zone Name
    Outdoors,                !- Outside Boundary Condition
    ,                        !- Outside Boundary Condition Object
    SunExposed,              !- Sun Exposure
    WindExposed,             !- Wind Exposure
    ,                        !- View Factor to Ground
    8,                       !- Number of Vertices
    65.000000, 65.000000, 8.373503,     !- X,Y,Z  3 {m}
    65.000000, 65.000000, 0.000000,     !- X,Y,Z  4 {m}
    65.000000, 75.000000, 0.000000,     !- X,Y,Z  5 {m}
    65.000000, 75.000000, 8.000000,     !- X,Y,Z  6 {m}
    65.000000, 70.323463, 10.700000,    !- X,Y,Z  7 {m}
    65.000000, 70.323463, 8.000000,     !- X,Y,Z  8 {m}
    65.000000, 65.646926, 10.700000,    !- X,Y,Z  1 {m}
    65.000000, 65.646926, 8.000000;     !- X,Y,Z  2 {m}

FenestrationSurface:Detailed,
    ZnWare:E_Wall:Roller_Door,  !- Name
    Door,                    !- Surface Type
    Exterior Roller Door,    !- Construction Name
    ZnWare:E_Wall,           !- Building Surface Name
    ,                        !- Outside Boundary Condition Object
    ,                        !- View Factor to Ground
    ,                        !- Shading Control Name
    ,                        !- Frame and Divider Name
    ,                        !- Multiplier
    4,                       !- Number of Vertices
    65.000000, 66.106057, 6.000000,     !- X,Y,Z  1 {m}
    65.000000, 66.106057, 0.000000,     !- X,Y,Z  2 {m}
    65.000000, 74.106057, 0.000000,     !- X,Y,Z  3 {m}
    65.000000, 74.106057, 6.000000;     !- X,Y,Z  4 {m}

--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Richard Raustad <RRaustad@...> wrote:
>
> If you look at the first 3 points in the BuildingSurface:Detailed 
> object, they are described opposite in direction to the fenestration 
> coordinates which may be confusing E+. I'm not sure of this, but you 
> could also try using point 3 as the first point in the list where point 
> 1 and 2 would be listed last. You could also try splitting up the 
> surface into 2 or more surfaces where the fenestration surface is 
> "within" the boundary of a 4-point surface.
> 




------------------------------------

The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are not allowed -- please post any files to the appropriate folder in the Files area of the Support Web Site.

EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable.  Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-digest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
    mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-fullfeatured@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/