[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Re: hole in the wall





Thank you, I think it is a good alternative way to achieve this.

On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Liam O'Brien <liambrn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 

Hi,

This is exactly what I have been trying to achieve over the past week. I believe, by definition, a zone must be fully enclosed by surfaces. Therefore, the next best thing would be surface which mimics a non-existant window. You could use the simple glazing system and define transmittance as 0.999 and the U-value as 7 (the limits). Increasing airflow would increase the effective U-value. I would think that the other inevitable simplications in the EP daylight model would be more significant than the 0.001 (or whatever) daylight you're reflecting out.

If you're trying to have light go from one zone to another, note that you might get unexpected results, as I recently posted on.

Please post if you're successful in a solution to this.

Liam



--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "Hu,Jia" <hujia06@...> wrote:
>
> Hello:
>
> I hope to define a window without any layers (a window hole) to get the
> illuminance at ref. point. EP does not allow the visual transmittance to be
> 1. Is there any approach in EP to define window hole? Thanks.
>




__._,_.___


The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection.  Limit attachments to small files.

EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable.  Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.




Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

__,_._,___