linad i checked surfaces how you said the area calculation is correct but volume calculation is not correct
Volume {m3} eio
Volume {m3} dbg Volume {m3} manually
area auto matice Floor Area {m2}manulay
OFFICE_WITHOUT_W 134.52 134.5186571 59.84
18.7 18.7
SMALL_OPEN_PLAN 844.42 844.4217123 550.08
171.88 171.9
STORAGE 177.4 177.3959114 20.16
6.34 6.3
MEETING_ROOM 325.62 325.6189978 88.64
27.69 27.7
OPEN_PLAN_OFFICE 1397.72 1397.716822 1947.84
608.7 608.7
OFFICE_WINDOW 56.27 -50.7803916 56.32
17.58 17.6
TOILET_CORRIDOR 323.99 323.9921315 190.08
59.37 59.4
BACK_ENTRANCE 49.84 -202.1452614 49.92
15.58 15.6
RECEPTION 432.77 432.7656433 153.28
47.95 47.9
I dont know why some results in debg file is NEGATION
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Linda Lawrie <linda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
- Hi linda,
- he sent me his file and i check it. and i don't know why eco file has incorrect number
- calculation by using openstudio area * hight
- Zone Name Volume {m3}
- OFFICE_WITHOUT_W 59.84
- SMALL_OPEN_PLAN 550.08
- STORAGE 20.16
- MEETING_ROOM 88.64
- OPEN_PLAN_OFFICE 1947.84
- OFFICE_WINDOW 56.32
- TOILET_CORRIDOR 190.08
- BACK_ENTRANCE 49.92
- RECEPTION 153.28
- auto calculation
- Zone Name Volume {m3}
- OFFICE_WITHOUT_W 99.75
- SMALL_OPEN_PLAN 844.42
- STORAGE 165.6
- MEETING_ROOM 299.54
- OPEN_PLAN_OFFICE 1397.72
- OFFICE_WINDOW 56.27
- TOILET_CORRIDOR 316.66
- BACK_ENTRANCE 49.84
- RECEPTION 409.85
- On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 3:51 PM, Linda Lawrie <linda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: