To clarify:
There is no persistent offset in (proportional + integral (PI)
control but there is a persistent offset in proportional-only (P)
control. The effect of the integral action in a (well tuned) PI
controller is to reduce the offset to zero on a timescale comparable
to the response time of the plant. If this response time is short
compared to the timescales of interest in the simulation, as it is
for most HVAC loops (excluding zone temperature control and thermal
storage tank control), then PI control is a very good approximation
to the ideal control assumed in EnergyPlus.
Phil
On 5/20/2012 4:48 PM, Ooi wrote:
This was explained last week. The time step integration
among the simulation managers is something better than PI,
i believe. In PI control, there will be an offset from the
setpoint. EP Simulation does not have these offset. It was
explained that the offset depends on the proportional
band, which is very closely related to gain in the P.
Hopw this helps.
ooi
--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"ohchoen" <ohchoen@...> wrote:
>
> Hi, I'd like to know that it is possible P or PI
Control using EP.
> is it possible??
>
--
Philip Haves
Leader, Simulation Research Group
Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
One Cyclotron Road, MS 90R3111
Berkeley, CA 94720-8134
(510) 486 6512 (office)
(510) 486 4089 (fax)
__._,_.___
Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
__,_._,___
|