RE: [Bldg-sim] [EnergyPlus_Support] Food for thought....

Hello:

I hate to jump in this late in the conversation, but here are a few more papers that you might find useful:

Song, S., Haberl, J. 2008. “A Procedure for the Performance Evaluation of a New Commercial Building: Part I – Calibrated As-built Simulation”, ASHRAE Transactions-Research, Vol. 114, Pt. 2, pp. 375-388 (June ).

Song, S., Haberl, J. 2008. “A Procedure for the Performance Evaluation of a New Commercial Building: Part II – Overall Methodology and Comparison of Results”, ASHRAE Transactions-Research, Vol. 114, Pt. 2, pp. 389 – 403 (June).

Haberl, J., Bou-Saada, T. 1998. “Procedures for Calibrating Hourly Simulation Models to Measured Building Energy and Environmental

Data,” ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 120, pp. 193 - 204 (August).

Haberl, J., Abbas, M. 1998. “Development of Graphical Indices for Viewing Building Energy Data: Part 2,” ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 120, pp. 162 - 167 (August).

Haberl, J., Abbas, M. 1998. “Development of Graphical Indices for Viewing Building Energy Data: Part 1,” ASME Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, Vol. 120, pp. 156 - 161 (August).

Haberl, J., Bronson, D., Hinchey, S., O'Neal, D. 1993. “Graphical Tools to help Calibrate the DOE-2 Simulation Program to Non-weather Dependent Measured Loads,” ASHRAE Journal, Vol. 35, No. 1, pp. 27 - 32 (January).

Bronson, D., Hinchey, S., Haberl, J., O'Neal, D. 1992. “A Procedure for Calibrating the DOE-2 Simulation Program to Non-Weather Dependent Loads,” ASHRAE Transactions-Research, Vol. 98, Pt. 1, pp. 636 - 652 (January).

Haberl, J., Bou-Saada, T., Soebarto, V., Reddy, T. 1998. “Use of Calibrated Simulation for the Evaluation of Residential Energy Conservation Options of Two Habitat for Humanity Houses in Houston, Texas,” Proceedings of the 11^th Symposium on Improving Building Systems in Hot and Humid Climates, Texas Building Energy Institute, Ft. Worth, Texas, pp. 1-15 (June).

In addition, there is ASHRAE research project 1404 by Abushakra and Reddy that is about to finish that has good advice on the use of short term data to predict long term energy use. Copies of the final report should be available shortly from Mike Vaughn.

Jeff

8=! 8=) :=) 8=) ;=) 8=) 8=( 8=) 8=() 8=) 8=| 8=) :=') 8=)8=?

Jeff S. Haberl, Ph.D.,P.E., FASHRAE..............jhaberl@xxxxxxxx

Professor............................................................Office Ph: 979-845-6507

Department of Architecture.............................Lab Ph:979-845-6065

Energy Systems Laboratory.............................FAX: 979-862-2457

Texas A&M University.....................................77843-3581

College Station, Texas, USA, 77843..................URL:www.esl.tamu.edu

8=/ 8=) :=) 8=) ;=) 8=) 8=() 8=) :=) 8=) 8=! 8=) 8=? 8=)8=0

From: bldg-sim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [bldg-sim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] on behalf of Joe Huang [yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 3:13 PM
To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bldg-sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] [EnergyPlus_Support] Food for thought....

Jim,

Sorry if I came off as a little smug. You've actually put in words the main reason why I think building energy modelers have steered away from using historical weather data, which is simply that of convenience, i.e., there are a lot of "typical year" weather files floating around, but getting hold of
a usable historical year weather file takes a little more work.

For the study that I mentioned, Dru and I did not have to do anything because the SANSOM data set,
available from NCDC, contained 25 years of historical weather files for 239 cities (same as TMY2s).

That was in 1996, and the availability of historical weather data has only increased exponentially since
then, although the building energy modeling community seems curiously to not have followed.
The most notable change, in my view, is NCDC's decision to put the entire ISH (Integrated Surface Hourly) data online in 2005, and then to make it free to all in 2011. This means that the raw weather reports
from major stations around the world ( ~ 1,500 in the US) are available stretching back to 1980.

I've been working with the ISH for many years now, and am able to generate complete weather files from any ISH file within seconds, and have been providing that as a service to customers. Sometime later this
year, I'll be rolling out something on the Web, but for now, those interested can just send me an e-mail.

The idea that the ISH is of questionable quality is, in my view, rather backwards. The ISH is a repository of the weather reports by the "official" weather stations around the world, so if you can't trust that, what can you trust?

Joe

Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.whiteboxtechnologies.com
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"

On 6/28/2012 11:48 AM, Jim Dirkes wrote:

Dear Joe,

No fair! You and Dru have been at the forefront energy modeling research for most of my adult life, and have a big head start.

My guess is that you spent a lot of time preparing the actual weather files for the research, however. Unless I’m missing something, the ready availability of high quality (e.g., no big hunks of missing data) actual weather data has been pretty limited until recently. With folk like Weather Analytics getting on board and making it pretty easy to get and inexpensive, it becomes a lot faster and lower cost than trying to clean some of the NOAA / NCDC data, not to mention getting good data for sites not in or near a major city.

Kudos for being way ahead of the industry curve (at least my own curve)! It’s getting easier to catch up!

p.s., Dru sent me that paper and I’ll be reading it with interest very soon.

From: Joe Huang [mailto:yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2012 1:53 PM
To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Jim Dirkes; bldg-sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Food for thought....

I've always thought it was a "no-brainer" to use actual weather data whenever you're comparing simulation results to actual consumption data. Even with the earliest degree-day software such as
PRISM (Princeton Scorekeeping Method) in the 1980's, it was stressed to use the degree days
from the period of record, and not the long-term average, so I'm not sure why this (using actual
year weather data) is such a revelation.

The variation in total energy consumption of course depends a lot on the building characteristics.
Back in 1996, Dru Crawley and I wrote a paper on "Does it matter which weather data you use in energy simulations?", for the ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings (it also appeared as two
separate ASHRAE papers at around the same time) where we took some prototypical building models (Dru did commercial, I did residential) and ran them with various "typical year" weather files and also 25 years of historical data in 10-12 US locations.

Joe
Joe Huang  
White Box Technologies, Inc.  
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D  
Moraga CA 94556  
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  
www.whiteboxtechnologies.com  
(o) (925)388-0265  
(c) (510)928-2683  
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"  
On 6/28/2012 8:49 AM, Jim Dirkes wrote:

Dear Forums,

I am busy preparing a short talk for the Fall ASHRAE Energy Modeling Conference. The topic is “An Approach for Calibrating Existing Building Energy Models to their Utility Consumption”.

As part of the preparation, I will address the issue of how muc h difference might result in energy conservation measure savings predictions if you use actual weather data for the billing period versus TMY data.

To get a rough idea how much variation there might be, I looked at Degree Days for a span of years. What a variation! (for the city I’m studying at least)

I am not yet sure how that affects total energy consumption – you’ll have to attend my presentation in Atlanta to find out J.

In the meantime, I am starting to think that existing building energy models should use actual weather, not TMY data. Have any of you run similar comparisons for existing building models?