Do you still have the IDF in Version 6.0? I know that the input format has change for many objects in version 7.10. Just curious.
The number I gave you was for one floor. Two floors together would be about 3.0 kw for heating or cooling. It is not very practical to use a single zone building for solar related study. Monthly report is also not very suitable to find simulation problems. Dr. Li To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx From: ordoumpozanis@xxxxxxxxx Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 14:42:31 -0700 Subject: Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Problem with low heting values from e+ Dear Dr. Li
Thank you for your answer. I agree with your results but a house as this one in
Greece
is expected to have mach more heating capacity from the calculated (5-8 kW system).In other buildings
simulation (but in version 6 of e+) I had no problems with the results but in this one I cannot accept
so low heating capacity as a correct values. I have discussed this problem with
some other e+ users in Greece
and they had the same problem but could not find the reason. So I'm looking either an error of mine or something that I could not find at this stage. From: YuanLu Li <yli006@xxxxxxxxxxx> To: EnergyPlus_Support <energyplus_support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Sunday, July 29, 2012 10:10 PM Subject: RE: [EnergyPlus_Support] Problem with low heting values from e+
I did not look at the IDF in detail. The simmulation with the DesignDay objects added was error free.
The summary report showed the floor area as 72 m2. The heating and cooling rates were around 1.5 kw for the Winter and SUmmer design days.. These capacity can be met with a portable unit. You were using annual simulation, and the result simply means that you may not need HVAC system. Dr. Li To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx CC: kontante@xxxxxxxxxxx From: ordoumpozanis@xxxxxxxxx Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 09:16:04 -0700 Subject: [EnergyPlus_Support] Problem with low heting values from e+ Dear E+ users
I
am having problem to understand why e+ gives very low heating values to the
attached model. It's a simple 2floor domestic house with an ideal system and
some classic internal load (people, lights, equipment) and an infiltration. The results give a value of 0.07 kWh/m2 witch is not realistic. I have checked
the internal load, I have changed a climate files but still cannot get
realistic values. The only thing that I can imagine is the thermal mass
but I have checked the material properties as well could you suggest any
other parameter that I might have not check, or if you had a similar problem to
propose me a solution
Thank you in regards
K.O.
__._,_.___ Primary EnergyPlus support is found at: http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at: http://www.energyplus.gov The group web site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/ Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files. EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |