For those of you who may be interested: It appears that there is no practical way to avoid this warning. If the steam plant temperature is equal to or greater than 100C+SubcoolC on the radiator, the
warning is apparent generated for every iteration of the radiator because the outlet condition is calculated to be greater than 100C. With the plant at 105C and the radiator sub cool at 5.1C, the warning still appears at low demand. Apparently the when the
minimum steam gulp is taken and the demand load is very low, not enough energy is removed to lower discharge temperature from the radiator to the acceptable 100C. I have tried reducing both the steam temperature and the sub cooling, but odd things happen
and outlet conditions went to negative temperatures for some reason. I can only assume that conservation of energy applies in the model, and any excess energy at the radiator outlet means less energy needs to go in at the boiler. This may be an Ideal Load radiator model, but it is far from an Ideal Steam Radiator model. An Ideal Steam Radiator model would always discharge condensate
no matter what the inlet steam conditions are (no need to specify sub cooling), and it would have a minimum steam gulp when cycled on for a short duration that could overheat the zone. Fortunately, this should not be a large error for most systems where steam loop temperature matches the radiator sub cool setting. If the demand is large enough
or the radiator is scheduled off during periods of light demand, the error warning may not occur at all. Mismatching the steam temperature and generating the warning all the time probably affects the energy consumption of the boiler. Ned Lyon, P.E. (MA, WV) SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER
From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Edward G. Lyon Well as it turns out, this is an inherited problem. I ran the example file 5ZoneSteamBaseboard.idf and it throws the same warning…. Ned Lyon, P.E. (MA, WV) SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER
From:
EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Richard Raustad
These 2 files did not look like they attached when I looked at the Yahoo group site, instead they were inline which was not my intention. I upload them instead to the Files\Examples folder.
On 3/14/2013 5:18 PM, Edward G. Lyon wrote:
-- Richard A. Raustad Senior Research Engineer Florida Solar Energy Center University of Central Florida 1679 Clearlake Road Cocoa, FL 32922-5703 Phone: (321) 638-1454 Fax: (321) 638-1439 or 1010 Visit our web site at: http://www.fsec.ucf.edu UCF - From Promise to Prominence: Celebrating 40 Years __._,_.___ Primary EnergyPlus support is found at: http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at: http://www.energyplus.gov The group web site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/ Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files. EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |