¿Are you sure “inaccuracy” due to this electric equipment it’s not much more smaller than “inaccuracy” due to assessment of occupation / lighting / other equipments profile? ¿Make sense to consider this small part of the building without take in consideration possible sensibility to occupational profiles variations? Josep Solé Sustainibility & Technical Manager Móvil +34 606 42 32 14 De: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] En nombre de Miguel Pacheco Because I suspect using the nominal power will be too high. The motor allows two different motions:
Why am I going to all the trouble? Because of this interview with Paul Torcellini from NREL about designing for ZEB (http://www.ecobuildingpulse.com/net-zero-energy/absolute-zero.aspx). If you want to design a net-zero-energy building, you really have to plan for 20 percent beyond zero (...) It’s very important to remember the details, like smoke alarms.
From: rahulathalye7 <rahula7@xxxxxxxxx> Motor power was from the catalog. The total usage was based on assumptions. __._,_.___ Primary EnergyPlus support is found at: http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at: http://www.energyplus.gov The group web site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/ Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files. EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional
Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe __,_._,___ |