I'm afraid you're missing the point.�� The original question was how
to model infiltration when the AFN is being used. My point was that you cannot mix the infiltration object in conjunction with the AFN.�� If you want to model infiltration with the AFN, you have to define the leakage characteristics of the space for the AFN�� (this should probably be done anyway for proper modeling - in fact, all these AFN programs such as COMIS and AirNet were originally designed not for modeling natural ventilation, but rather infiltration).�� Sure, you can use a blower door test to get the leakage fraction, but that has to be used as an input to the AFN, not to the infiltration object.���� I've always been adverse to modeling infiltration as a constant air change rate, because that's nonphysical and not what really happens.�� IMHO, it's always much better to define the physical characteristics of the space (leakage-fraction, area of cracks, etc.) and then use a physical model like the Sherman-Grimsrud or the AFN to then compute the hour-to-hour infiltration. Joe Joe Huang White Box Technologies, Inc. 346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 108D Moraga CA 94556 yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data (o) (925)388-0265 (c) (510)928-2683 "building energy simulations at your fingertips" On 3/10/2013 9:25 AM, Oscar Hernandez wrote:
|