ÂSolar radiation includes for all frequencies in the EMR-spectrum.
Thermal Absorbtance = Infrared (IR) spectrum (long-wave) which
overlaps very slightly with some of the visual spectrum.
When we talk about the emissivity of a product, we usually refer to
it's IR emissivity. This is because this bandwidth carries
proportionally the most energy (by far) of all the bandwidths (that
generally get absorbed by most materials) and accounts for a very
large percentage of all absorbed solar radiation.
So how can it be that you have specified 0.90 for Thermal Absorbtion
whilst visual and solar absorbtion are 0.2 (which I find
unrealistically low)?
Usually the Thermal Absorbtion is the most important field and is at
least similar to the Solar (because it has the heaviest energy
weighting).On 10.07.2014, at 06:11, "Asit Mishra asitkm76@xxxxxxxxx
Mit freundlichen Grü�en- Sent from my iPhone (excuse the brevity)
i. A.
Jean Marais
b.i.g. bechtold
Tel. +49 30 6706662-23
[EnergyPlus_Support]" <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 0.9, !- Thermal Absorptance
> 0.2, !- Solar Absorptance
> 0.2; !- Visible Absorptance
__._,_.___