Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Re: Swimming pool object: unrealistic result- volume of make-up water too big

To: "EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Re: Swimming pool object: unrealistic result- volume of make-up water too big

From: "jonathan duverge jduverge1979@xxxxxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support]" <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 21:25:49 +0000 (UTC)

Authentication-results: mta1002.groups.mail.bf1.yahoo.com from=yahoo.com.au; domainkeys=neutral (no sig); from=yahoo.com.au; dkim=pass (ok)

Authentication-results: mx24.antispamcloud.com; dmarc=pass header.from=yahoogroups.com

Authentication-results: antispamcloud.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sentto-3387488-35565-1450214753-linda=fortlawrie.com@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Authentication-results: antispamcloud.com; dkim=pass header.i=yahoogroups.com

Delivered-to: mailing list EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:26:04 -0700

Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoogroups.com; s=echoe; t=1450214753; bh=Cn4sX64wB5IF/k+Om9f/fvNFcwL3DPX7Z1W4Xg3qxuw=; h=To:In-Reply-To:References:From:List-Id:List-Unsubscribe:Date:Subject:Reply-To:From:Subject; b=3w0uhUAsF6gDqyd5qNixaW8wJmFJCkcNuv34KvGfB35JmGdlh06GGOMLXXaskrymTjVSbrU+BO6gccdW15Aqxy5xG4cJic4uq9WglIXZJYcbtAFmM9AQEkw0UQEDTxg96oc9b0TTJQGEbuBlwEVpU2rEQwhaZcFKtBPc8hfP/tE=

Envelope-to: linda@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

In-reply-to: <n2hrj1+1hf9b8f@YahooGroups.com>

List-id: <EnergyPlus_Support.yahoogroups.com>

List-unsubscribe: <mailto:EnergyPlus_Support-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com>

Mailing-list: list EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; contact EnergyPlus_Support-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

References: <n2hrj1+1hf9b8f@YahooGroups.com>

Reply-to: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Sender: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Hi German

I contacted you a couple of time regarding the indoor swimming pool module. I send several ticket to E+ helpdesk. It seems to me that they refuse to accept that there is an issue. You report it in Github and they close it straight away without even investigating it. The person that was looking after the ticket said that this issue was fixed in ver 8.4 and I think they made it most. I don't think he even had a look at the files that i send him to prove that there is an issue. He closed my tickets without even addressing the issue. Is there anything that i can do or anyone that i can report to. I'm actually doing a Phd on Aquatic centres and I need to know if they will fix this issue or it's just going to be left like this.

Regards

Jonathan

On Wednesday, 18 November 2015, 23:40, "ecoeficiente@xxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support]" <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello Jonathan, I see that you have used DesignBuilder to develop the model and add the swimming pool afterwards. I have done this before with realistic results, but as you can see in the bug I reported (https://github.com/NREL/EnergyPlus/issues/4805) water flow input was asked in m3/s while it actually was used internally as kg/s.

It seems to be corrected in v8.4 but there may be still a bug there. It seems that they have not updated Energy+.idd file and still shows m3/s as unit in the IDFEditor. I will report that in Github.

Hope this clue is useful for you...

Cheers,

GermÃ¡n.

__._,_.___

Posted by: jonathan duverge <jduverge1979@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Primary EnergyPlus support is found at: http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at: http://www.energyplus.gov The group web site is: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/ Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files. EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.

Visit Your Group

New Members 12

• Privacy • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

__,_._,___