[Equest-users] Code compliance in v3.64

Greg Collins GCollins at glumac.com
Mon Sep 27 10:00:47 PDT 2010


In my experience thus far, the compliance engine in eQuest is definitely
pickier than with the normal simulation.  I'm sure you know there are
additional fields that become available once you set the analysis type
to one of the compliance options, so make sure all of those fields get
filled in.  What are the specific errors you're getting?

 

Greg Collins
GLUMAC | (949) 833-8190

 

From: Alex Densmore [mailto:adensmore at integralgroup.com] 
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 9:31 AM
To: equest-users at lists.onebuilding.org
Subject: [Equest-users] Code compliance in v3.64

 

Hi users,

 

I'm curious if anyone has been using the new compliance module for v3.64
in the detailed mode. I've been encountering a large number of "rules
evaluation" errors, and every time I fix one there seems to be 5 more
that pop up in its place. These are more difficult to de-bug than normal
errors because the message doesn't clearly lead you to where the error
is, and it's not a DOE-2 error that I can fix in the inp file.

 

Has anyone successfully done a Title 24 or 90.1 compliance run in
detailed mode? Any tips - or do I just have to slog through these errors
(which probably means I'll just switch to EnergyPro)?

 

Alex Densmore, PE, LEED AP
Project Engineer  


Please Note New Name and Address

________________________________

I N T E G R A L

                          GROUP

 

427 13th Street, Oakland CA 94612
510 663 2070 x 237

adensmore at integralgroup.com <mailto:adensmore at integralgroup.com> 
www.integralgroup.com <http://www.integralgroup.com> 
________________________________

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.onebuilding.org/pipermail/equest-users-onebuilding.org/attachments/20100927/68774d34/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the Equest-users mailing list