The LEED for Retail New Construction and Major Renovations reference guide under EAc1 outlines a baseline refrigeration system. We have used this for Austin Energy Green Build in the past. It does a pretty good job but is a little vague on some of your issues. The Energy Trust of Oregon has a version as well: http://energytrust.org/library/forms/NBE_PG_TechGuidelines.pdf.
Tim
Tim Johnson Mechanical Engineer o 208.336.4900 | d 208.577.5645 >>> Jim Dirkes <jim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 1/22/2014 3:32 PM >>> Dear Forum, I am modeling a supermarket which has made effort to install refrigerated casework that is more efficient than “normal” in three ways: �&nbbsp; Casework lighting is LED instead of fluorescent � &nbbsp; Evaporator fans use ECM motors and are demonstrably more efficient � &nnbsp; The compressors have higher COP I did not realize that claiming savings from a “process” load also requires substantiation of the Baseline energy for the process load via comparison to several similar facilities or a published paper. I wish I knew that months ago! We have data from three other supermarkets owned by the same company, but these other examples are not identical. So far, all I can say is that: a) Manufacturer literature claims that LEDs used in their casework use ~ 65% less energy than fluorescent lights b) ECM fans use about 35% less energy in a manufacturer power comparison table c) The COP is better (I do not have detailed data yet) This strikes me as a fairly weak argument, so I am asking you for suggestions or published data to strengthen the argument. p.s., My last alternative is to ignore the process energy savings and make it the same for both models. I think the savings are substantial, however, and would rather find a way to claim them! "Attack me � rather than the path I follow and whichh I point to anyone who asks me where I think it lies. If I know the way home and am walking along it drunkenly, is it any less the right way because I am staggering side to side?" Leo Tolstoy |