What you say is true, but it's not the only effect of window blinds. Of the solar radiation that's intercepted by window blinds, most of it is reflected back out of the window depending on its reflectance, a small fraction (< 5%) is transmitted, and the remainder absorbed and reradiated as long-wave radiation. So, when I hear
that window blinds actually increase the indoor air temperature, this would imply that the reradiated long-wave is significantly greater than the reflected short-wave, which would happen only if the blinds are heavy and dark. However, all the blinds I've seen, especially those used for solar control, are either white or very light in color.
It's pretty well-known that external blinds are more effective than internal blinds for reducing unwanted solar gain. However, this is the first I've heard that internal blinds are not just ineffective, but counter-productive. In rereading the original post, I noticed it said "Zone mean air temperature" and "Surface inside face temperature" have both gone up. I'm not particularly surprised at the latter, because blinds tend to have higher absorptivity than glazing (although I would caution not to ignore the transmitted short-wave through the window in comparing surface
temperatures), but I am surprised at the former. I don't want to speculate further on this until I know more how the blinds are being modeled, how the zone is being controlled, and how the HVAC, if there is one, is being modeled.
The following link is for a paper done in 2004 studying the same issue in a similar building (80% glazing on the facades) and comparable climate (Canada). That study concluded that internal blinds reduced cooling loads on a continuum depending on their reflectance, with the best (90% reflectance) approaching but still significantly less effective than external blinds.
http://sbrn.solarbuildings.ca/c/sbn/file_db/Doc_File_e/Simulation%20design%20study%20for%20the%20facade%20renovation.pdfJoe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com/ for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
It may be explained that, the blinds absorb short wave solar heat and radiate long wave heat. We know glass is opaque to short wave radiant heat. Therefore heat is trapped inside room.
â??â?«Ù?Ù? جÙ?از اÙ?Ù? iPhone اÙ?خاص بÙ?
I can't point to a study, but the guys at trnsys have told me that studies have shown that internal blinds bring little to no positive effect on room heat gain.
However, as we're on the topic of blinds, could someone please draw up a table showing which controls are effected by which input parameters, e.g. Control type glare - does it go the the "fixed slat" position on trigger or does it change possition between min/max slat angles to maintain a setpoint?
There are a lot of control options...a table would be a great addition to the documentaion.
Hmmm, interesting. Wouldn't the blinds reflect a fair amount of the solar back out through the window? Seems counter-intuitive that deploying blinds behind a window will increase rather than decrease the mean air temperature of the space. Have we been wrong all these decades? I'd still
like to know the thermal/optical characteristics of the window and the blinds. I suppose having a black
blind behind a window with very low IR transmissivity might create problems.
Joe
On 10/8/2014 4:45 PM, 'Edward G. Lyon'
eglyon@xxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
The low mass blinds will also absorb all the solar and transfer it to the interior air. Without blinds, the solar hits a more massive floor/walls with much less immediate transfer to the air. This could give you higher cooling peak demand.
Ned Lyon, P.E. (MA, WV)
Staff Consultant
SIMPSON GUMPERTZ & HEGER
781.907.9000 main
781.907.9350 direct
617.285.2162 mobile
781.907.9009 fax
http://www.sgh.com/
I suspect there's something wrong in the modeling of the blinds. The effect of night sky radiation is not so pronounced on a window, because (1) half of
what it sees is ground, (2) the other half is the sky at low angles where the sky temperatures are much less depressed as they are looking straight up the sky.
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com/ for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
If you have a building with lots of glass, don't forget the radiant exchange with the night sky at -60 C. The "radiant night cooling" is possibly being blocked by the blinds, if the blinds are there during the night.
Mit freundlichen Grü�en- Sent from my iPhone (excuse the brevity)
Hello,
I've designed a south facing room with a floor- to-ceiling window and
blinds covering the whole surface of the window. I run two simulations, one with no blinds on the window and one with blinds covering the window in order to compare the results. The building's location is in Eastern Europe. The run period is from July to August (sunny and hot period). Both output variables "Zone mean air temperature" and "Surface inside face temperature", have much higher values when the simulation is run with the blinds on the window. How can this be possible? Can it be explained in a way or is there something wrong with the data?
Thanks in advance,
Anna V.