What you say is true, but it's not the only
effect of window blinds. Of the solar radiation
that's intercepted by window blinds, most of it
is reflected back out of the window depending on
its reflectance, a small fraction (< 5%) is
transmitted, and the remainder absorbed and
reradiated as long-wave radiation. So, when I
hear that window blinds actually increase the
indoor air temperature, this would imply that the
reradiated long-wave is significantly greater than
the reflected short-wave, which would happen only
if the blinds are heavy and dark. However, all the
blinds I've seen, especially those used for solar
control, are either white or very light in color.
It's pretty well-known that external blinds are
more effective than internal blinds for reducing
unwanted solar gain. However, this is the first
I've heard that internal blinds are not just
ineffective, but counter-productive. In rereading
the original post, I noticed it said "Zone mean
air temperature" and "Surface inside face
temperature" have both gone up. I'm not
particularly surprised at the latter, because
blinds tend to have higher absorptivity than
glazing (although I would caution not to ignore
the transmitted short-wave through the window in
comparing surface temperatures), but I am
surprised at the former. I don't want to
speculate further on this until I know more how
the blinds are being modeled, how the zone is
being controlled, and how the HVAC, if there is
one, is being modeled.
The following link is for a paper done in 2004
studying the same issue in a similar building (80%
glazing on the facades) and comparable climate
(Canada). That study concluded that internal
blinds reduced cooling loads on a continuum
depending on their reflectance, with the best (90%
reflectance) approaching but still significantly
less effective than external blinds.
http://sbrn.solarbuildings.ca/c/sbn/file_db/Doc_File_e/Simulation%20design%20study%20for%20the%20facade%20renovation.pdf
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 10/8/2014 10:58 PM, Almofeez almofeez@xxxxxxxxx
[EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
It may be explained
that, the blinds absorb short wave solar
heat and radiate long wave heat. We know
glass is opaque to short wave radiant heat.
Therefore heat is trapped inside room.
من
جهاز الـ iPhone الخاص بي
في ٠٩/١٠/٢٠١٤، الساعة ٨:٣١ ص، كتب "'jeannieboef@xxxxxxxxx' jeannieboef@xxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support]" <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
I can't point to a
study, but the guys at trnsys have told
me that studies have shown that internal
blinds bring little to no positive
effect on room heat gain.
However, as we're on
the topic of blinds, could someone
please draw up a table showing which
controls are effected by which input
parameters, e.g. Control type glare -
does it go the the "fixed slat" position
on trigger or does it change possition
between min/max slat angles to maintain
a setpoint?
There are a lot of
control options...a table would be a
great addition to the documentaion.
Hmmm,
interesting. Wouldn't the blinds
reflect a fair amount of the solar
back out through the window?
Seems counter-intuitive that
deploying blinds behind a window
will increase rather than decrease
the mean air temperature of the
space. Have we been wrong all
these decades? I'd still
like to know the thermal/optical
characteristics of the window and
the blinds. I suppose having a
black
blind behind a window with very
low IR transmissivity might create
problems.
Joe
On 10/8/2014 4:45 PM, 'Edward G.
Lyon' eglyon@xxxxxxx
[EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
The
low mass blinds will also
absorb all the solar and
transfer it to the interior
air. Without blinds, the
solar hits a more massive
floor/walls with much less
immediate transfer to the
air. This could give you
higher cooling peak demand.
Ned
Lyon, P.E. (MA, WV)
Staff
Consultant
SIMPSON
GUMPERTZ & HEGER
781.907.9000 main
781.907.9350 direct
617.285.2162 mobile
781.907.9009 fax
www.sgh.com
I suspect there's
something wrong in the
modeling of the blinds.
The effect of night sky
radiation is not so
pronounced on a window,
because (1) half of what
it sees is ground, (2)
the other half is the
sky at low angles where
the sky temperatures are
much less depressed as
they are looking
straight up the sky.
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 10/7/2014 11:00 PM, 'jeannieboef@xxxxxxxxx' jeannieboef@xxxxxxxxx
[EnergyPlus_Support]
wrote:
If you have a
building with lots
of glass, don't
forget the radiant
exchange with the
night sky at -60 C.
The "radiant night
cooling" is possibly
being blocked by the
blinds, if the
blinds are there
during the night.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen- Sent from my
iPhone (excuse
the brevity)
Hello,
I've designed a
south facing
room with a
floor-
to-ceiling
window and
blinds covering
the whole
surface of the
window. I run
two simulations,
one with no
blinds on the
window and one
with blinds
covering the
window in order
to compare the
results. The
building's
location is in
Eastern
Europe. The run
period is from
July to August
(sunny and
hot period).
Both output
variables "Zone
mean air
temperature" and
"Surface inside
face
temperature",
have much higher
values when the
simulation is
run with the
blinds on the
window. How can
this be
possible? Can it
be explained in
a way or is
there something
wrong with the
data?
Thanks in
advance,
Anna V.