I like the way you are breaking this down and would love to hear also how you consider the LONG wave radiation (which to my understanding carries the bigger "chunk" of the energy).
I was thinking roughly as follows: Long wave hits glass (emmissivity 0.7) --> 30% gets through Long wave hits slat (emmissivity highly variable... a "bad" blind may be cheaply painted and have the emmissivity degraded from 0.3 to 0.95) --> 5% hit floor and 95% is absorbed and reradiated equally in both directions. Long wave from blind towards window --> hits window (e=0.7) --> 30% reflected back towards blind --> loop continues until dissipated (I'm assuming a gauss-seidel or similarely solved differential equation)
So now comparing to (in FullExterior mode) all the entering radiation hits floor and the reflected (0.5%) is area weightedly distributed to all zone surfaces, the windows amongst these recieve a significant portion to reradiate (question is if the energy is reproportioned appropriately into short wave and long wave reradiating from the floor).
One aspect which is not talked about is whether the model accounts for the locally increase air temperatures between blind and window and the heat transfer from this air to the outdoors. The surface temps of both blinds and glass pane may significantly change surface airflows (convection heat exchange from air to surface). Mit freundlichen Grü�en- Sent from my iPhone (excuse the brevity)
i. A. Jean Marais b.i.g. bechtold Tel. +49 30 6706662-23
What you say is true, but it's not the only effect of window
blinds. Of the solar radiation that's intercepted by window blinds,
most of it is reflected back out of the window depending on its
reflectance, a small fraction (< 5%) is transmitted, and the
remainder absorbed and reradiated as long-wave radiation. So, when
I hear that window blinds actually increase the indoor air
temperature, this would imply that the reradiated long-wave is
significantly greater than the reflected short-wave, which would
happen only if the blinds are heavy and dark. However, all the
blinds I've seen, especially those used for solar control, are
either white or very light in color.
It's pretty well-known that external blinds are more effective than
internal blinds for reducing unwanted solar gain. However, this is
the first I've heard that internal blinds are not just ineffective,
but counter-productive. In rereading the original post, I noticed
it said "Zone mean air temperature" and "Surface inside face
temperature" have both gone up. I'm not particularly surprised at
the latter, because blinds tend to have higher absorptivity than
glazing (although I would caution not to ignore the transmitted
short-wave through the window in comparing surface temperatures),
but I am surprised at the former. I don't want to speculate further
on this until I know more how the blinds are being modeled, how the
zone is being controlled, and how the HVAC, if there is one, is
being modeled.
The following link is for a paper done in 2004 studying the same
issue in a similar building (80% glazing on the facades) and
comparable climate (Canada). That study concluded that internal
blinds reduced cooling loads on a continuum depending on their
reflectance, with the best (90% reflectance) approaching but still
significantly less effective than external blinds.
http://sbrn.solarbuildings.ca/c/sbn/file_db/Doc_File_e/Simulation%20design%20study%20for%20the%20facade%20renovation.pdf
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 10/8/2014 10:58 PM, Almofeez almofeez@xxxxxxxxx
[EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
It may be explained
that, the blinds absorb short wave solar heat and
radiate long wave heat. We know glass is opaque to
short wave radiant heat. Therefore heat is trapped
inside room.
â??â?«Ù?Ù? جÙ?از
اÙ?Ù? iPhone اÙ?خاص بÙ?â?¬
I can't point to a study, but the guys at trnsys
have told me that studies have shown that internal
blinds bring little to no positive effect on room
heat gain.
However, as we're on the topic of blinds, could
someone please draw up a table showing which
controls are effected by which input parameters,
e.g. Control type glare - does it go the the "fixed
slat" position on trigger or does it change
possition between min/max slat angles to maintain a
setpoint?
There are a lot of control options...a table
would be a great addition to the documentaion.
Jean
Hmmm, interesting.
Wouldn't the blinds reflect a fair amount of
the solar back out through the window? Seems
counter-intuitive that deploying blinds behind
a window will increase rather than decrease
the mean air temperature of the space. Have
we been wrong all these decades? I'd still
like to know the thermal/optical
characteristics of the window and the blinds.
I suppose having a black
blind behind a window with very low IR
transmissivity might create problems.
Joe
On 10/8/2014 4:45 PM, 'Edward G. Lyon' eglyon@xxxxxxx
[EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
The low mass blinds will
also absorb all the solar and transfer
it to the interior air. Without
blinds, the solar hits a more massive
floor/walls with much less immediate
transfer to the air. This could give
you higher cooling peak demand.
Ned Lyon, P.E.
(MA, WV)
Staff
Consultant
SIMPSON GUMPERTZ
& HEGER
781.907.9000 main
781.907.9350 direct
617.285.2162 mobile
781.907.9009 fax
www.sgh.com
I suspect there's something wrong
in the modeling of the blinds.
The effect of night sky radiation
is not so pronounced on a window,
because (1) half of what it sees
is ground, (2) the other half is
the sky at low angles where the
sky temperatures are much less
depressed as they are looking
straight up the sky.
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 10/7/2014 11:00 PM, 'jeannieboef@xxxxxxxxx'
jeannieboef@xxxxxxxxx
[EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
If
you have a building with lots
of glass, don't forget the
radiant exchange with the
night sky at -60 C. The
"radiant night cooling" is
possibly being blocked by the
blinds, if the blinds are
there during the night.
Mit
freundlichen Grü�en- Sent
from my iPhone (excuse the
brevity)
Hello,
I've designed a south
facing room with a floor-
to-ceiling window and
blinds covering the whole
surface of the window. I
run two simulations, one
with no blinds on the
window and one with blinds
covering the window in
order to compare the
results. The building's
location is in Eastern
Europe. The run period is
from July to August (sunny
and hot period). Both
output variables "Zone
mean air temperature" and
"Surface inside face
temperature", have much
higher values when the
simulation is run with the
blinds on the window. How
can this be possible? Can
it be explained in a way
or is there something
wrong with the data?
Thanks in advance,
Anna V.
__._,_.___
Posted by: "jeannieboef@xxxxxxxxx" <jeannieboef@xxxxxxxxx>
Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
__,_._,___
|