As one of the founding members of the Urban Heat Island Project in
LBNL back in the mid-1980's, I believe I have some understanding of
the Urban Heat Island. The reason I do not consider reduced night
sky radiation as a major cause is that the amount of night sky
radiation per surface area from an UHI is roughly the same, and
actually a little more because its elevated temperatures, than that
of the surrounding area. However, due to the thermal mass of the
buildings, there is more heat to be rejected, and thus it takes
several hours for the UHI to dissipate. In other words, it's the
increased thermal mass and low albedo that are the prime drivers in
creating the characteristic UHI temperature profile - no difference
from the countryside at sunrise, slowly increasing through the day,
peaking right after sunset, and then slowly dissipating through the
night. What you call "trapping outgoing radiation" is to me more a
fundamental thermal characteristic of buildings.
During the time when I was most involved with the UHI Project in the
early 1990's, we used several mesoscale climate models, esp. MM5,
to simulate UHIs over entire metropolitan areas, such as the whole
LA Basin or Sacramento, and then used those results as input weather
data for BES programs like DOE-2 or EnergyPlus.
The two types of programs operate in different domains, and are each
so complicated that we never thought of combining them together.
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 10/10/2014 12:57 PM, 'julie, julie futcher, futcher'
julieannfutcher@xxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
there are many different urban heat islands - the
most commonly talked about effect is the nocturnal
canopy layer urban heat island...(CLUHI), that is the
ait temperature difference between a non-urban setting
and a urban setting... you are right these nocturnal air
temperature differences are found to be more intense in
the down town area... where the buildings are usually
taller, blocking the transport of stored heat to the
cold night time sky. this is governed by the amount of
visible that a point of the urban surface can
see...this parameter is called the Sky view
factor (SVF)... Urban Geometry is the prime mechanism
for the amount of heat that can escape the system....
At the same location the daytime air temperatures are
often found to be lower. as a result of the same
parameter URBAN GEOMERTY
the parameters you describe (1) and (3) are found to
make a contribution, but these are not as significant as
the role of urban geometry...
Whilst materials & thermal storage plays a role,
it is the trapping of this outgoing radiation that is
the main factor...
The UHI are a significant and miss understood
phenomena.... unfortunately, energy+ other such tools
are limited in their ability to report on these effects,
which cannot be accounted for entirely with an air
temperature uplift and the lowering of wind
speeds... BUT this is something we are working on!
I think its worth running the thing again with the
blinds open at night!
J
I doubt very much that blocking heat
loss to the night sky is the prime cause
of the urban heat island.
From my readings and research, the
causes of urban heat islands are (1) the
increased amount of thermal mass due to
buildings, especially downtown, (2) the
reduced albedo due to the combination of
dark man-made surfaces (asphalt,
concrete, dark roofs) and multiple
reflections between buildings and the
ground, and (3) reduced wind speed due
to greater surface roughness. The urban
heat island is most intense after sunset
as the countryside cools quicker than
does the city, but that's because cities
retain more of the daytime heat, rather
than have less capacity to shed it to
the night sky.
I also remain skeptical about reduced
night sky radiation causing blinds to
raise mean zone air temperatures, and if
EnergyPlus indeed does show that, I
would look into its calculation of night
sky radiation.
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com/ for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 10/9/2014 3:21 PM, 'julie, julie
futcher, futcher' julieannfutcher@xxxxxxxxx
[EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
I'd run the simulation
again - but opening the
blinds at night... as suspect
that the heat is trapped within
the room...blocking heat loss to
the night time sky is (dare I
say it) the prime cause of the
urban heat island effect.... it
would be an interesting result
if open the blinds after sunset
reduced overheating risks!!
J
Good
analysis, Joe!
One possible
explanation to
the higher
room
temperature
may be that
shortwave
radiation
would have
fell on the
concrete floor
without the
blinds. So the
internal
blinds in
effect quicken
the thermal
response of
room�
Yi
What you
say is true,
but it's not
the only
effect of
window
blinds. Of
the solar
radiation
that's
intercepted by
window blinds,
most of it
is reflected
back out of
the window
depending on
its
reflectance, a
small fraction
(< 5%) is
transmitted,
and the
remainder
absorbed and
reradiated as
long-wave
radiation.
So, when I
hear that
window blinds
actually
increase the
indoor air
temperature,
this would
imply that the
reradiated
long-wave is
significantly
greater than
the reflected
short-wave,
which would
happen only if
the blinds are
heavy and
dark. However,
all the blinds
I've seen,
especially
those used for
solar control,
are either
white or very
light in
color.
It's pretty
well-known
that external
blinds are
more effective
than internal
blinds for
reducing
unwanted solar
gain. However,
this is the
first I've
heard that
internal
blinds are not
just
ineffective,
but
counter-productive.
In rereading
the original
post, I
noticed it
said "Zone
mean air
temperature"
and "Surface
inside face
temperature"
have both gone
up. I'm not
particularly
surprised at
the latter,
because blinds
tend to have
higher
absorptivity
than glazing
(although I
would caution
not to ignore
the
transmitted
short-wave
through the
window in
comparing
surface
temperatures),
but I am
surprised at
the former. I
don't want to
speculate
further on
this until I
know more how
the blinds are
being modeled,
how the zone
is being
controlled,
and how the
HVAC, if there
is one, is
being modeled.
The following
link is for a
paper done in
2004 studying
the same issue
in a similar
building (80%
glazing on the
facades) and
comparable
climate
(Canada).
That study
concluded that
internal
blinds reduced
cooling loads
on a continuum
depending on
their
reflectance,
with the best
(90%
reflectance)
approaching
but still
significantly
less effective
than external
blinds.
http://sbrn.solarbuildings.ca/c/sbn/file_db/Doc_File_e/Simulation%20design%20study%20for%20the%20facade%20renovation.pdf
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com/ for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
It may be
explained
that, the
blinds absorb
short wave
solar heat and
radiate long
wave heat. We
know glass is
opaque to
short wave
radiant heat.
Therefore
heat is
trapped inside
room.
من
جهاز الـ iPhone
الخاص بي
I can't
point to a
study, but the
guys at trnsys
have told me
that studies
have shown
that internal
blinds bring
little to no
positive
effect on room
heat gain.
However,
as we're on
the topic of
blinds, could
someone please
draw up a
table showing
which controls
are effected
by which input
parameters,
e.g. Control
type glare -
does it go the
the "fixed
slat" position
on trigger or
does it change
possition
between
min/max slat
angles to
maintain a
setpoint?
There are
a lot of
control
options...a
table would be
a great
addition to
the
documentaion.
Hmmm,
interesting.
Wouldn't the
blinds reflect
a fair amount
of the solar
back out
through the
window? Seems
counter-intuitive
that deploying
blinds behind
a window will
increase
rather than
decrease the
mean air
temperature of
the space.
Have we been
wrong all
these
decades? I'd
still
like to know
the
thermal/optical
characteristics
of the window
and the
blinds. I
suppose having
a black
blind behind a
window with
very low IR
transmissivity
might create
problems.
Joe
On 10/8/2014
4:45 PM,
'Edward G.
Lyon' eglyon@xxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support]
wrote:
The low
mass blinds
will also
absorb all the
solar and
transfer it to
the interior
air. Without
blinds, the
solar hits a
more massive
floor/walls
with much less
immediate
transfer to
the air. This
could give you
higher cooling
peak demand.
Ned
Lyon, P.E.
(MA, WV)
Staff
Consultant
SIMPSON
GUMPERTZ &
HEGER
781.907.9000 main
781.907.9350
direct
617.285.2162
mobile
781.907.9009 fax
http://www.sgh.com/
I suspect
there's
something
wrong in the
modeling of
the blinds.
The effect of
night sky
radiation is
not so
pronounced on
a window,
because (1)
half of what
it sees is
ground, (2)
the other half
is the sky at
low angles
where the sky
temperatures
are much less
depressed as
they are
looking
straight up
the sky.
Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com/ for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
If you
have a
building with
lots of glass,
don't forget
the radiant
exchange with
the night sky
at -60 C. The
"radiant night
cooling" is
possibly being
blocked by the
blinds, if the
blinds are
there during
the night.
Mit
freundlichen
Grüßen- Sent
from my
iPhone (excuse
the brevity)
Hello,
I've
designed a
south facing
room with a
floor-
to-ceiling
window and
blinds
covering the
whole surface
of the window.
I run two
simulations,
one with no
blinds on the
window and one
with blinds
covering the
window in
order to
compare the
results. The
building's
location is in
Eastern
Europe. The
run period is
from July to
August (sunny
and
hot period).
Both output
variables
"Zone mean air
temperature"
and "Surface
inside face
temperature",
have much
higher values
when the
simulation is
run with the
blinds on the
window. How
can this be
possible? Can
it be
explained in a
way or is
there
something
wrong with the
data?
Thanks in
advance,
Anna V.
__._,_.___
Posted by: Joe Huang <yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx
The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection. Limit attachments to small files.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.
__,_._,___
|