[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] Re: custom weather file with multiple years with the converter tool



Hi Joe,

on the BBSR homepage you can find TRY data sets. It is well known that the resulting TRYs were established with raw data that was recorded sometimes falsely by the american convention for some periods. The DWD responsible have not wanted to share the raw data. You could try and approach them for it. I have not gone that far yet. Dru and Linda have gained permission under conditions from both DWD and BBSR to use the TRY dataset to make epws. They have ensured that irregularities if they exist are "cleaned up". German regulation specifies the use of the TRYs for several compliance simulation types, so it was important to use the TRYs specifically to make epws.

If you email me privately, I can fish out my old contacts at DWD and BBSR for you if you are interested in contacting them.

Best regards,

Jean

 

Incidentally,  it has also occurred to me that an even simpler and perhaps less confusing way to account for the  sun position in -0:30-0:30 solar data is to NOT move the building Longitude by 7.5 degrees, but just to add 0.5 to the Time Zone!

Joe

Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 2/10/2016 8:49 PM, Joe Huang wrote:
I've been quiet on this thread because I decided the situation is so confusing the only way to verify the right direction is to look at some weather files compiled with the solar data as -0:30-0:30.  So, I went on the EnergyPlus Weather site to look for European weather data compiled by Europeans (NOT the IWEC which were done by ASHRAE and hence follow the -1:00-0:00 convention) and could only find one set - the IGDG data for Italy.  I had hoped that comparing the hours of sunrise and sunset would reveal the direction of the shift.  However, I was surprised to find the comparison to be inconclusive, because there were days when the IGDG has sunrise in an earlier hour and sunset in a later hour than on the IWEC2!  This tells me there was a difference in how the "equation of time" has been calculated.

Therefore, I ask those  with European-compiled weather files, esp. Lukas and Jean, to send me a few sample files to test out my hypothesis.

Joe
Joe Huang
White Box Technologies, Inc.
346 Rheem Blvd., Suite 205A
Moraga CA 94556
yjhuang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://weather.whiteboxtechnologies.com for simulation-ready weather data
(o) (925)388-0265
(c) (510)928-2683
"building energy simulations at your fingertips"
On 2/8/2016 11:56 PM, lukas.rokka@xxxxxxxxx [EnergyPlus_Support] wrote:
 

Jim,


Your example is correct, but what is your conclusion: move the building to the east or west?


East is the right answer. I'm attaching a radiation rose by WUFI that expects solar data in the same convention as E+. The data is imported as .epw file with the solar data as -0:30-0:30, for Greenwich, London (lat=51.5, long=0). Left figure is shifted east, middle no shift and right shifted west.


You can test it in E+ as well by meassuring the yearly amount of solar radiation recivied by a west and an east oriented walls, these sums should match.


Regards,

Lukas


Ha ha... If you guys are confused, us plebs feel like we're in a roman administration house. For the record, the last time Joe was on this topic with me, he said to move the building location eastwards +7.5 deg :-). I have to agree.

On 7 Feb 2016 6:21 pm, "lukas.rokka@... [EnergyPlus_Support]" <EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
 

Joe,


Sorry but I've to argue you there. Having data of -0:30-0:30 convention in Energyplus means that your data is half an hour ahead in time. You have to give that information to EP, this is done by adding 7.5 degrees (going eastwards).


E.g. at time stamp 6:00 EP would normally do sun position calculation using the 5:30 time stamp, because of the TimeHourOffset=-0.5 setting. But with data in -0:30-0:30 format we want it to make the sun position calculation with the 6:00 time stamp instead, right? Adding 7.5 degrees takes out the TimeHourOffset=-0.5 parameter (+7.5 degrees longitudes equals +0.5 hour on the clock => 7.5 degrees + -0.5 hours = 0), thus the sun position calculation is correctly done at the 6:00 time stamp.


I agree it is confusing though.


Regards,

Lukas




--

James V Dirkes II, PE, BEMP, LEED AP
CEO/President
The Building Performance Team Inc.
1631 Acacia Dr, GR, Mi 49504

Direct: 616.450.8653
jim@...

Website l  LinkedIn

Fail faster!





__._,_.___
Posted by: Jean Marais <jeannieboef@xxxxxxxxx>


Primary EnergyPlus support is found at:
http://energyplus.helpserve.com or send a message to energyplus-support@xxxxxxxx

The primary EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov

The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/

Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high speed connection.  Limit attachments to small files.

EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable.  Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the Documentation link and press the "search" button.




__,_._,___