Nick,
Sorry if I gave the impression I’m not interested in or appreciate
aesthetics. I actually see my role as marrying architecture and engineering so
I need to understand both. I was just trying to think about the maths side of
it. Many times I have received a sketchup model from an architect and it is nigh-on
impossible to use for modelling and simulation use as it’s just too fancy (for
want of a better phrase).
I agree everyone welcome here. I was just making some comments
too.
Cheers
Paul
From: Nick Caton [mailto:ncaton@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 30 October 2009 01:19
To: Paul Carey; EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
bldg-sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Bldg-sim] [EnergyPlus_Support] I need advices for choosing
a GUI
Paul et al,
Apologies if my comments were misconstrued either as a bash
against Designbuilder or a sales pitch for Sketchup. My post was and is
intended to clarify Sketchup’s current .dwg file support and the related cost
implications. I personally am in full support of any and all
options/progress/market competition as necessary to advance the science of
building energy modeling.
Both Sketchup (in tandem with a variety of plugins and external
software) and Designbuilder are unique and powerful tools that each do a
variety of specific things very well.
“…but
let’s face it, as building physicists we’re generally not
interested in architectural fancifulness. We are interested in boxes
(well more or less) that make the maths quicker. “
To be fair, sometimes the task-at-hand does call for a bit of
“architectural fancifulness,” such as when presenting results of preliminary
massing studies to an architect/client! From my perspective, Sketchup and
Designbuilder both have a definite advantage over some of the “for-cost”
competition in this regard.
I’d also like to kindly clarify for any newer subscribers:
you don’t have to be a hardcore physicist with zero aesthetic
inclinations to participate in [bldg-sim] or other onebuilding.org mailing
lists! I’ve only been subscribed for a year, but it’s apparent that
experienced and inexperienced energy simulation enthusiasts alike are welcome
from all walks of the academic world and design industry.
~Nick
NICK CATON, E.I.T.
PROJECT ENGINEER
25501 west valley parkway
olathe ks 66061
direct 913 344.0036
fax 913 345.0617
Check out our new web-site @ www.smithboucher.com
From: Paul Carey [mailto:paul@xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 5:04 PM
To: Nick Caton; 'Kevin Kyte'; 'Jackson, Alan';
EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bldg-sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [Bldg-sim] [EnergyPlus_Support] I need advices for choosing
a GUI
Nick et al,
I still think DesignBuilder offers good value for money when you
compare it to the cost of the pro-version of sketch-up. It imports dxf,
pdf, tiff, bmp, jpg (for 2d extruded modelling) & gbxml (for 3d
importing). Ok, perhaps it isn’t quite as pretty as SketchUp in places,
but let’s face it, as building physicists we’re generally not interested in
architectural fancifulness. We are interested in boxes (well more or
less) that make the maths quicker. DesignBuilder does all that just the
same. It also has the advantage of the CFD tool module that allows you to
look more closely airflow distribution based on the results from your
EnergyPlus simulations which are directly linked if you want them to be and
produces mean age of air results, that you could use for other ventilation
& comfort analysis.
Just my tuppence/2 cents worth.
Cheers
Paul
|
|
Dr Paul Carey BSc (Hons) PhD FRSA Director Low Carbon Energy Assessor |
Zero Energy Design Ltd 10A Portland Place 2-22 Mottram Road Stalybridge SK15 3AD |
|
T: 0161 3386200 F: 0161 3031281 M: 0789 4098012 |
E: paul@xxxxxxxxxx W: www.zed-uk.com |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Certificate No: GB16647 |
Certificate No: GB16646 |
|
Please carefully consider the environment before you print this
email.
Company Registered in England & Wales. Registration
No. 5815068
Registered Address: 10A Portland Place, 2-22 Mottram Road,
Stalybridge, SK15 3AD, UK.
Privilege and Confidentiality Notice:
This email and any attachments to it are intended only for the
party to whom they are addressed. They may contain privileged and/or
confidential information. If you have received this transmission in
error, please notify the sender immediately and delete any digital copies and
destroy any paper copies. Thank you.
From: bldg-sim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:bldg-sim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Nick Caton
Sent: 29 October 2009 21:41
To: Kevin Kyte; Jackson, Alan; EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bldg-sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] [EnergyPlus_Support] I need advices for choosing
a GUI
The current version of free sketchup (as of this month I
believe) does not support .dwg importing, actually. If you continue using
any older version – it shouldn’t lose this functionality (keep your
installation files). The Sketchup development team has been clear on
their intent to continue .dwg and other proprietary format file support in the
Pro version.
**A moment on my soapbox**
Our office took this as a cue to recognize that the free version
of Sketchup is explicitly intended for educational/trial purposes, however
powerful it may be – not for professional design use. Our office
purchased a Pro license in response to ensure continued support of
import/export of .dwg and other formats we use. I’d encourage others on
bldg-sim to consider this carefully. The cost:benefit ratio of the free
version of Sketchup, for many of us, is pretty extraordinary. To top it
off it’s actually fairly inexpensive as far as professional design tools go.
**Stepping off the soapbox**
On a Sketchup-related note – I haven’t mentioned this on
[bldg-sim] yet, but Sketchup-savvy users using a version with .dwg export
support can actually export their models into AGI32 for photometric and
rendering lighting/daylight studies after a little work in CAD to ensure a
clean import. I might write up an illustrated guide or post the full
scoop here at some point in the future, but for those interested in learning
immediately I’ll just say to head over to the AGI32 forums to find a lengthy
post (intended to troubleshoot other AGI32-specific issues) where I composed a
pretty decent outline of the process to start.
~Nick
NICK CATON, E.I.T.
PROJECT ENGINEER
25501 west valley parkway
olathe ks 66061
direct 913 344.0036
fax 913 345.0617
Check out our new web-site @ www.smithboucher.com
From: bldg-sim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:bldg-sim-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Kevin Kyte
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 2:43 PM
To: Jackson, Alan; EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bldg-sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] [EnergyPlus_Support] I need advices for choosing
a GUI
Free sketchup is not going to support dwg importing for much
longer.
From: Jackson, Alan
[mailto:ajackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 1:09 PM
To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: bldg-sim@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Bldg-sim] [EnergyPlus_Support] I need advices for choosing
a GUI
In what sense?
If you mean it doesn’t have every single capability of modeling
like the IDF or Text editor would, yes. But nothing does. It’s hard to keep up
with the E+ developer cycle ;-)
If you mean it doesn’t run off Energyplus 3.0. It does.
I don’t use it because it’s too expensive. I prefer OpenStudio
and the IDF Editor/Textpad because you have access to all the capabilities that
E+ has to offer, but it took me years to become even semi comfortable (read:
confident) with modeling through a txt file.
Either way maybe this should be moved over to BLDG-SIM.
Alan Jackson, LEED AP
KlingStubbins
From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Emanuele Naboni
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 1:03 PM
To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] I need advices for choosing a GUI
Yes, but Hevacomp does not have the
capabilities of EnergyPlus.
--
Emanuele Naboni
per l'Italia: 346.4133337
from US: +39.346.4133337
skype: emanuelenaboni
MArch, PhD Building Science, LEED AP, EU licensed architect
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
2009/10/29 Jackson, Alan <ajackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
You
should look into Hevacomp which is being revamped for the US.
Alan
Jackson, LEED AP
KlingStubbins
From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Josh K
Sent: Thursday, October 29, 2009 12:00 PM
To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] I need advices for choosing a GUI
Hello;
My feeling is that their currently is not a *perfect* GUI for EnergyPlus,
especially if you're interested in interoperability (ie IFC, gbXML, etc).
Designbuilder seems to be getting closest in this regard, but when I tested it
a while ago I found the modelling interface to be a bit clumsy and restrictive.
OpenStudio is not bad, but still needs a little work to be practical for every
day use (for instance, to my knowledge there is currently no good way to
specify a heat transfer surface's adjacency conditions). I currently use
ECOTECT, which had a lot of promise when I started using it three years ago but
has progressed exactly zero since then. I don't know much about the other
system you mention.
To summarize: the three you mention will all probably work for you, and each
have their own advantages and disadvantages. If you're specifically interested
in IFC compatibility, I'm not sure about the status of DesignBuilder in this
respect, but neither OpenStudio nor ECOTECT currently have this capability.
Josh
On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 7:14 AM, bcavallier
<bruno.cavallier@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello,
I want to learn EnergyPlus but I need a GUI. As it is a new activity for me, I
would like to find the better couple [E+/GUI] regarding my needs. I am mainly
interested in building energy simulation, particularly on the topics of energy
efficiency and the smart use of solar energy for solar passive designing. I saw
a lot of software on the web : Google Sketch Up with Openstudio, Designbuilder
(well described at Harvard), Ecotect...
How can I make the best choice? My choice will use the IFC standard. I saw
another software : Digital Project of Gehry Technologies which is based on
Catia (Dassault Systemes) that works with IFC standards, but has anyone made
simulation with [E+/this soft]?
Could you give me advices, please...
Best regards
B.Cavallier
--
Josh Kjenner, P.Eng., LEED AP
Manasc Isaac Architects Ltd.
10225 100 Avenue :: Edmonton, AB T5J 0A1
780.429.3977
--
Emanuele Naboni
per l'Italia: 346.4133337
from US: +39.346.4133337
skype: emanuelenaboni
www.emanuele-naboni.com
sustainable design consultant - consulente per la sostenibilita' di tecnologie,
edifici e citta'
MArch, PhD Building Science, LEED AP, EU licensed architect
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
__._,_.___
Messages
in this topic (5) Reply (via web post) | Start
a new topic
The primary
EnergyPlus web site is found at:
http://www.energyplus.gov
The group web site is:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EnergyPlus_Support/
Attachments are currently allowed but be mindful that not everyone has a high
speed connection. Limit attachments to small files.
EnergyPlus Documentation is searchable. Open EPlusMainMenu.pdf under the
Documentation link and press the "search" button.
Change
settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch
delivery to Daily Digest | Switch
format to Traditional
Visit
Your Group | Yahoo! Groups
Terms of Use | Unsubscribe
.
__,_._,___