Dear Charlie,
Thank you very much for your detailed and welldocumented answer. I do agree
with you, however I must underline the fact that many buildings are not painted
and furthermore many of them could be using cool materials plastering on
vertical surfaces as well as on horizontals, such as roofs. As regards to the
engineering reference not all materials are gray and opaque.
It would be really helpful if this was an input choice in E+.
Regards
I.
--- In EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
"D. Charlie Curcija"
<curcija@...> wrote:
>
> Emissivity is not the same as absorptance/absorptivity. Not even close.
> Emissivity is measured in Far IR range (thermal radiation), while
> asbortptivity is measured in Solar (UV, VIS,
Near IR) range. Big
> difference, since solar radiation is at approximately 5600K, while thermal
> radiation is at approximately room temperature (plus/minus 40K).
>
>
>
> BTW, this is a common misconception and very often these quantities are
> confused, leading some to believe that white painted surface has low
> emissivity, which is not true. Unless the paint is specifically designed
to
> be low-emissivity (not easy), all paints have emissivity of 0.9 regardless
> of color or appearance. However, shiny white paint will have very low
> absorptivity, while dull black paint will have very high absorptivity.
This
> behavior is utilized in the design of cool roofs, where low solar
> absorptivity is sought.
>
>
>
> Since all surfaces in buildings are painted, it is safe to assume that
> emissivity is always 0.9, which is probably the reason that there is no
> field to enter it, however this should change as we see more and more
> specially designed low-e paints, even in window frames.
>
>
>
> D. Charlie Curcija
> DesignBuilder Software
> 16 Bridge St.
> Millers Falls, MA 01349
>
> Tel: (413) 256-4647
> Fax: (413) 256-4823
> cell: (413) 575-3487
> email: <mailto:curcija@...>
> curcija@...
> web: <http://www.designbuildersoftware.com/>
> http://www.designbuildersoftware.com
>
> STATEMENT OF CONFIDENTIALITY
> The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments
to
> this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and
may
> contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the
intended
> recipient, please notify DesignBuilder Software immediately at either +1
> (413) 256-4647 or at <mailto:home@...>
> home@..., and destroy all copies of this message and
> any attachments.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Linda Lawrie
> Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 10:22 AM
> To: EnergyPlus_Support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [EnergyPlus_Support] calculating emissivity of materials
>
>
>
>
>
> At 03:39 AM 6/2/2010, ifigeneiat wrote:
>
> I would like to know how E+ is calculating the emissivity of materials
(not
> the glazing ones). I am guessing it is an indirect proceedure, as there is
> no specific input field for this subject.
>
>
> I believe the input absorptance/absorptivity for materials is the same as
> emissivity.
>